Employers nowadays put more emphasis on social skills. Some people believe that social skills are important in addition to good qualifications for job success. Do you agree or disagree?
These days, to qualify more on social skills becomes employee's requirement and some people opine that this should be required to meet job accomplishment. Partially, I consent to the same point of view for several reasons which I will elaborate in the forthcoming paragraph.
On the one side, in my viewpoint, running for successful business is supposed to priortise more on professional skill rather than social skill. It is obvious that the high-rank companies employ qualified ones to avoid job failure. To exemplify, a tax accountant assures detail financial report by performing meticulous and intellectual work. Furthermore, if the employees carry out loyalty to devote in their work, they will achieve a great job satisfaction. Regarding company's responsibilties, it is a mandatory to appreciate those who work for years and perform remarkable value with incentives and bonuses.
On the flip side, perhaps, this issue probably determines how the organisation expands its business relationship. Seemingly, to collaborate with bigger organisations requires excellent communication skills the employees should be able to. As a result, this significantly leads to great benefits for business development. Additionally, that social ability facilitates better individual's performance seems beneficial. Barely did the worker show discomfort and stressful condition, other workers would not be gratified their remarkable performance. Hence, the higher career prospects likely rely on how teamwork employees carry on during working hours.
To sum up, priotising social skills to gain qualified workers brings several merits including expanding the company's relationship and enhancing workers' job achievement. This is as long as the business owner wisely opts the qualified professionals hired.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-27 | Zahid6400 | 61 | view |
| 2022-12-22 | Mollymaul | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-21 | Andi Irwan Nur | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-19 | dds | 61 | view |
| 2021-12-24 | Mishika sugandhi | 78 | view |
- Today the expensive price of popular consumer products is because of the power of advertising and not real needs of people Do you agree or disagree 73
- In many countries people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could Why do you think this is What can be done to change this 89
- The noise level around us is constantly increasing and affecting the quality of our lives What causes the everyday noise that many people face What can be done about it 84
- There is more and more outrage and anger common in society today Why is this Is this a positive or a negative development 67
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... that social ability facilitates better individuals performance seems beneficial. Barely di...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, regarding, so, as a result, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87022900763 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23973638554 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675572519084 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7868183381 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.533333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4666666667 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197032963237 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590054026541 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752318057703 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124994857732 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502548690798 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.47 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... that social ability facilitates better individuals performance seems beneficial. Barely di...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, regarding, so, as a result, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87022900763 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23973638554 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675572519084 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7868183381 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.533333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4666666667 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197032963237 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590054026541 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752318057703 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124994857732 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502548690798 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.47 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.