The chart below gives information about different types of waste disposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011
The two pie charts compare the percentage of many kinds of rubbish disposal in a certain nation in the year 1960 and 2011.
Overall, the figures for Paper, Textiles and the others waste saw downward trends while the opposite was true for those of the four categories namely: Metal, Plastic, Wood, and Food,. A noticeable observation is that the percentages of Glass and Green wasted shared almost the same figure in two years.
Firstly, the proportion of garbage disposal from Food accounted for over one in ten, followed by 8% that of Metal and Plastic, exactly 4% from Wood in the first given year. In addition, waste from Food, Wood, and Plastic rose double whilst that of metal just increase by 1% from 1960 to 2011.
In terms of Paper and textiles, the proportion of Paper constituted 25%, 8 % by far higher than that of Textiles, two times as much as that of Others waste in 1960. In 2011, there waswere more waste from paper than textiles, 15% versus 11%. While the figure for the other waste in 1960 was a third in 2011 and made up the least rate amongs all the listed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-08 | tr_h.20 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-01 | Zhoungli | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | viethung123 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-08 | khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh | view | |
| 2022-11-07 | khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh | view |
- Too much emphasis is placed on testing these days The need to prepare for tests and examinations is a restriction on teachers and also exerts unnecessary pressure on young learners How far do you agree or disagree with this view 89
- The table shows the price of a cup of coffee in six cities from 2010 to 2014 in Australia 78
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some individuals feel that working from home while of benefits for employees is actually drawbacks for employers To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Attendance at cultural events in Great Britain 96
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 182, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...s namely: Metal, Plastic, Wood, and Food,. A noticeable observation is that the pe...
^^
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s much as that of Others waste in 1960. In 2011, there waswere more waste from pap...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57731958763 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2540197127 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587628865979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9997702198 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181377805415 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874214571725 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446530829956 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115586193322 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470838995905 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.