Some believe that people are naturally born leaders while others feel that leadership skills can develop. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
With the prospect of society, humans these days have to be developed various qualifications to meet the requirement in the competitive labor market, particularly leadership skills. Yet there are some valid arguments that leadership skills are innate, and leaders are gifted, the others believe that leadership skills can be shaped through hard practice. This essay will shed light on both views before making the final decision.
On the one hand, it is easy to understand why some people think that leadership skills are characteristics that some people may be born with. From past to present, leaders are people who always possess different necessary personality traits, thereby making others admire and follow their example. Moreover, great leaders often possess optimism and energy that can encourage others to work effectively and have a striking relationship with their partners as well. They have the ability to recognize the strengths and weaknesses of their colleagues after cooperation. In fact, some studies have shown that these characteristics are genetic, as are certain individual talents that ones can be blessed with at birth. For instance, Barack Obama has a special charisma allowing him to inspire passion and energy in other people, and this trait is considered an innate ability.
On the other hand, reflecting the thriving of society, leadership skills are no longer unfamiliar because these skills are becoming a crucial element among youngsters. Due to the fact that educational programs have been more concerned than ever so that children can be joined in comprehensive lessons, including vocational training, and vivid practical lessons to discover their merits. From that, learners will be provided with proper training to enhance the strong points and simultaneously improve the weak points. Therefore, leadership skills can be built after persistent practice. Making elite leaders need different factors such as discipline nad resourcefulness, which can definitely be developed through upbringing environment. Furthermore, unless people experience a great deal of time to challenge themself and overcome difficulties, they will not be able to build up confidence and mastery of their area. If they do not own these qualifications, a leader’s capacity may be questioned, and as a result they are likely to heed the leader’s direction.\
In conclusion, I hold a belief that leadership skills are formed by both genetic and enhanced through training, experience, and a myriad of hard work. There are many people born without natural leadership skills that can still become good leaders in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-29 | Tramtrr.21 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | Anonymous | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-06 | Harman97 | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-24 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | phuong anh nguyen chin chin | 73 | view |
- Topic The pie charts show the size of classes in primary schools in four states in Australia in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph shows the value in US dollars in millions of dollars of investment in funds of four categories from 1988 to 2014 73
- Topic In some countries schools are teaching foreign languages for primary school children Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Topic The graph shows the number of people taking part in 4 kinds of sports in a particular region between 1985 and 2005 84
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel Do you agree or disagree with this view 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2237.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 406.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50985221675 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94999456059 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583743842365 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6883505505 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.588235294 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8823529412 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05882352941 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299614897243 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990095106442 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866632575566 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20781857088 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506800965506 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.