The table below shows information about age, average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in USA.
The given table illustrates the information about the percentage of the population in 3 different states in the USA divided by age group, per capita income, and poor household.
Overall, it can be seen that Utah had the smallest rate of people over 60 years and the largest proportion of people in all of 3 states, while the population living in poverty in California was higher than in other regions, despite having the highest average income per person.
As per the table, people under 18 years made up more than a quarter of the population in Utah, whereas the figures for California and Florida were significantly lower than, 17% and 16% respectively. In addition, the rating of elderly people in Florida was 23%, which was approximately double that of Utah, about 8%.
Turning to these other categories, the average salary of citizens in California was $23.000, while the average for those living in Florida was less than 1.000, about $22.000. as for Utah, the figure for economic status was only $17.000 so poverty line of the population had the lowest percentage, at 9%. in contrast, the rating of poor household in California and Florida were 16% and 12% respectively.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
2023-02-09 | Kimm2903 | 73 | view |
2022-12-30 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
2022-12-30 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
2022-12-30 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The diagram shows the plan of medical center in 2008 and 2010 48
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 73
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 58
- The diagram shows the plan of medical center in 2008 and 2010 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...orida was less than 1.000, about 2.000. as for Utah, the figure for economic statu...
^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ation had the lowest percentage, at 9%. in contrast, the rating of poor household ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, as for, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91959798995 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70919058827 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557788944724 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.2962281696 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.857142857 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194161472844 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915265360029 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856379272889 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137476847309 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860955313756 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.