The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014.
The following two pie charts compare the proportion of volunteers across different retail sectors in 2008 and 2014.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the health care, sport and environmental sectors of volunteering. However, the opposite was true in educational, art and other sectors.
According to the pie chart in 2008, it is obvious that the percentage of volunteers by educational institutions was highest, which was 24%. This was 3% lower than the proportion of volunteers by education, which was the percentage of volunteers by environmental in 2008. The percentage of art volunteers took up 18% of the number of volunteers by organizations in 2008. In 2008, the proportion of volunteers in sport was similar to the other sectors, accounting for 15%. Finally, the proportion of volunteers in health care was the lowest in all organization sectors, accounting for 7%
It can be seen that in 2014, the stages of volunteers by environmental were the highest and increased moderately to 29%. This was 4% lower than the proportion of volunteers by environment, which accounted for 25% and increased dramatically. The percentage of volunteers that come from the third sector accounted for 17% and there was a sharp decline of 7% between 2008 and 2014. This was 5% lower than the percentage of volunteer work for the art sector in 2014. The proportion of volunteer by the other sector was the fifth 9% and declined by 6% between 2008 and 2014. The lowest was the percentage of health care volunteers, which accounted for 8%, and there was an unremarkable change between 2008 and 2014 by just 1%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Mei1312 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | bobsubnot | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | minhphambinh1234 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 84
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 56
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 67
- You are planning to take a vacation Write a letter to a friend In your letter describe the vacation spot you have chosen explain how you plan to spend your time there invite your friend to join you on your vacation Begin your letter as follows 56
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03745318352 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05378752668 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.411985018727 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.9 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1340947591 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.461538462 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.07692307692 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323516532492 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164528370571 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974391108523 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206120816159 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122867316325 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.