In many countries schools have severe problems with student behaviour. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest?
It is perceived by many that in this modern era, schoolers behave badly in public in a lot of nations. This assay will discuss fully both reasons and solutions for this issue.
Hardly can anyone deny the increasing of the number of children which have troubles with their behavior. There are some causes which are culprits of this issue, one of which is that their parents nowadays do not spend enough time for teaching their children how to behave properly. Indeed, they have to work all day long even at weekend. That means they are so busy and do not make time for their kids. As a result, children do not receive the education from their parents as they should do. For example, kids in Ho Chi Minh city often say bad words because their parents do not tell how wrong it is. The other reason which also need to be concerned is that the development of the internet. Undoubtedly, children can learn bad things easily because they watch many videos which are not made for their age via youtube, TikTok and so on.
On the other hands, there are some solutions for this issue which I should recommend. The first one is that not only parents but only schools should involve in taking active to reduce the number of children with bad behavior. To be specific, kids should be taught when they behave badly. Besides, they should be rewarded when they act in good way. For instance, if children say bad words, their parent should give a punishment like not allowing them use their smartphone or going out with friends. Another action which we should take is that adults should control what schoolers watch on the internet to make sure these contents are educational for them.
To sum it up, it's too much to cover all reasons and solutions for the trouble which children behave badly. Therefore, the aforementioned ideas are main ideas which raise concern.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-10 | huynguyen37 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | quynhanhvu | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-16 | dorae | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | TinaLam | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | TinaLam | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 61
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6880733945 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25095980405 2.80592935109 80% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544342507645 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1205115969 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1666666667 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72222222222 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11516209699 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411975402335 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301903461708 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722776901015 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350246602871 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.