The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The greatest nations that ever existed in history were mostly lead by great leaders, but in my opinion, a nation can only be great, if all its citizens are provided with all the basic needs, life without war and a milieu where peace and humanity is of utmost importance. A country leader may have many achievements, but until those achievements directly reflect the welfare of the country and progress of a country, I personally cannot title the country as a ‘great nation.’ I would like to support my stance with a couple of examples.
First of all, two of the ‘great countries’ in my opinion are the United States of America and England. These are great countries because, as an outsider, I see the advancement in these nations, and with a direct comparison to my country, India, they are far more developed. These countries have good residential areas, the largest economies, proper healthcare and so many advantages to living there. But when you change your perspective, and look towards the recent leaders of these counties, such as ex- president Donald Trump and President Joe Biden in the USA, or the two most recent prime ministers of England, Boris Johnson and Liz Truss, we can easily notice how poorly they performed in further developing their nations. Mr. Donald Trump had a lot of scandals and right wing views, but even during his term of presidency, the USA still kept its title as one of the greatest nations. Another example is that of ex-prime minister of England, Liz Truss. The economy of England, was coming down rapidly and Liz Truss failed to keep her promises of delivering certain mandates, which would improve England’s condition, this even led her to resign from her position. Even after having incompetent leaders, these nations have still stood as global powers, all because of their constitutions, which keep the country’s welfare at the forefront.
On the other hand, we have President Vladmir Putin of Russia, who was determined to acquire land from the Ukraine, which he believed should rightfully be under Russia. To get back the land waged war with the Ukraine, putting citizens of both the counties in harm’s way. Even though he managed to acquire some of the land and lead the war, which was an achievement for him and his parliament, he is responsible for the deaths of a lot of people. This is the prime example of the achievements of the leaders of a nation don’t attribute to the nation being great, but it is the condition and welfare of the citizens that makes it great.
Nevertheless, I do partially agree that, some leaders who work towards the development of their country and help the country advance are also somewhat responsible for their nation being great. But I do still stand firm upon my stance of the issue. A great nation constitutes of the people of the country who make it great, by living in peace and harmony, and always looking forward to a better future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-01 | student193044 | 50 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Jhon Kwame | 50 | view |
- There is now evidence that the relaxed pace of life in small towns promotes better health and greater longevity than does the hectic pace of life in big cities Businesses in the small town of Leeville report fewer days of sick leave taken by individual wo 78
- Although innovations such as video computers and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students these technologies all too often distract from real learning Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 58
- The most ideal path for a society to set up its youngsters for positions of authority in government industry or different fields is by imparting in them a feeling of collaboration not rivalry Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you a 66
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 50
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement a 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... way. Even though he managed to acquire some of the land and lead the war, which was an ach...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 263, Rule ID: CONSTITUTES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'consists of'?
Suggestion: consists of
... my stance of the issue. A great nation constitutes of the people of the country who make it g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, still, such as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2436.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 503.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84294234592 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63858518564 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526838966203 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 746.1 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.4050844243 60.3974514979 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.294117647 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5882352941 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172375404789 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520953379719 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399697669739 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108793590465 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219274609001 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.