Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Education is indeed a broad concept; it includes not only conveying academic knowledge but also developing various aspects of students including their future career. In this regard, and from the preconception that students are not fully-fledged to make a reasonable decision, some people argue that education institutions should hamper students from persuing careers that is seemingly not suitable to their bent. However, I adamantly believe that educational institutions have no responsibility to deter students from persuing fields they are not likely to succeed in.
Granted, it is true that students are not fully-fledged to objectively assess themselves, and thus there are some occasions where students revert to the career path suggested by their teachers after realizing ther limitations. For example, in case of dealing with Edward Witten, one of the most prominent luminary in the theoretical physics field, he first started his career as a lawyer. However, he later realized his limitation as a lawyer, and reverted back to the academica, the field that was suggested by his parents and teachers. Now, as mentioned above, he is now considered to be one of the greatest living physicsts in the entire world. As this compelling example shows, there are some occasions where students fail after pursusing fields of study in which their teachers deemed not likely to succeed.
Regardless of the previous case, however, it should be noted that changes in modern society are not predictable even for educational institutions. To elaborate, the vicissitude of industries are hard to be forecasted because of the inexorable advances in the current society enabled by technological advances. Take AI generated images and its impact on art industry as an example. Before the advent of the AI that generates images that cannot be differentiated from those by human expers, the most important virtue for painters, especially for those in the industries, was to simply draw well. However, the situation has dramatically changed due to the machine-learning assisted AI image generator. The image generating AI produces high quality paintings that is not discernable from human-generated paintings, which enabled some pieces to receive prominent art rewards. This changed the required virtue for painters from dawing well to configuring well; the ability to provide more suitable explanation that leads AI to produce the desired output became also an important virtue for painters.
In addition, it should be noted that there are many cases where students develop their talent long after they enter the field. Take Feeman Dyson as an example. Although he is now considered one of the most influential quantum physicsts, he was first dissuaded by his advisor, which resulted in the conflict between him and his advisor and his not receiving PhD. However, he later developed his talent as a physicst and engended a series of novel theoretical concepts that enabled the new field of physics, which is quantum field theory. In addition to this obvious examples, there are other prominent figures who developed their talents long after they enter the field. Therefore, even if a student is not seemingly talented in a specific field for now, it does not mean that he will not succeed in that field in the long run.
In brief, I believe that educational institutions should not discourage students from pursuing the field which students are not likely to succeed in, for even educational institutions cannot forecast the required virtue for a specific job and students can develop their talent in the long run.
- Two years ago radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call in advice programs that it broadcast since that time its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly Given WCQP s recent succe 63
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
- The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten year budget for the city of Calatrava The birthrate in our city is declining in fact last year s birthrate was only one half that of five years ago Thus the number of students enroll 69
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for th 62
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppor 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 813, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... teachers deemed not likely to succeed. Regardless of the previous case, however...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, in addition, in brief, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.3162921348 221% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3032.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 573.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29144851658 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89258810929 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89396060703 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476439790576 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 956.7 704.065955056 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5836066848 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.818181818 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0454545455 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04545454545 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222629960276 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660131253416 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712262989033 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145463018903 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716559978006 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 168.0 100.480337079 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.