Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
There are many characteristics required for a leader to be effective. The prompt provides a comparison of importance between two charactertistics, stating that sound moral judgement is an important characteristic of an effective leader, but it is not as important as a leader's ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers. I mostly disagree with this assertion for the following reasons.
Firstly, there is a possibility that a scenario may arise where the leader has to make a choice between saving the face of the government or the ruling party by making a decision which may have a bad impact on the reputation of his peers or go down the corrupt path and maintain the respect of his peers. For instance, if some leaders of the ruling political party have been caught in a scandal, the leader has two options, either make a moral judgement and not favor the culprits, or favor them and maintain their reputation. In such a case, effectiveness will only be proven if the leader chooses the right path and makes the right decision by not favoring the culprits. Thus, a sound moral judgement plays a very important role in such scenarios.
Progress of a team depends majorly on the decisions taken by a leader. If the leader chooses to maintain the respect of his or her peers, and take the path which is immoral, it may affect the team as a whole. For an instance, in a corporate office, two managers are handling a development team, one of the managers notices that the other manager is taking advantage of the hybrid mode and not working hard enough, and is exploiting the team members to do the work. The effective choice in this case would definitely be to report to higher authorities and get the manager replaced, which will speeden up the team's progress, since now, the employees working in the team are more productive and know that their manager is a great leader and has made a right decision, thus delivering great results.
It is known for a fact that favoring peers who are doing something immoral has even put the leadership as a whole at stake. There have been many instances in history where the culprit has been held guilty and the people supporting him have also been punished. To avoid such situations, it is very important to make a moral judgement and no relationships should affect this judgement or opinion. An effective leader should be very neutral in taking a decision.
On the contrary, there might be a situation where accusations have been made on a person but nothing has been proven yet, in such a case, the effective leader should be neutral and should definitely support his peers and make no judgement unless anything is proven.
In conclusion, in my opinion, if talked in terms of importance, a moral judgement stands above maintaining the respect of peers, it is situational as well, but this is true majority of the times.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 66
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of sidewalk rage similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The resul 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...leader, but it is not as important as a leaders ability to maintain the respect of his ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, thus, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2383.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 500.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.766 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75806526391 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 752.4 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.0402603421 60.3974514979 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.176470588 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4117647059 23.4991977007 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288640714244 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102119209969 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103102527904 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157218259793 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117755171845 0.0667264976115 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.