Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. to what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is claimed that ex-convicts can give advice for students about the potential hazards of committing an offense. While I agree that this might be an effective method, I would argue that there are several better alternatives to talking to teenagers.
On the one hand, it is apparent that the stories of ex-convicts may carry more weight than someone who has not experienced the criminal justice system firsthand. This is because people who have been released from prisons can be seen as credible messengers, and they can share some stories about how they became involved in crime, the dangers of a criminal lifestyle, and life in prison. Hence, this vivid and natural evidence can considerably affect teenagers’ perception and thought, thereby influencing the vulnerable minds of students.
Nevertheless, I also believe that there are some underlying education methods as opposed to ex-prisoners holding a talk to youngsters. The first and foremost option is associating with the magnitude of parents who act as pioneers in shaping their children’s attitudes toward crime. Children learn by observing their parents, and if parents engage in criminal activities or exhibit antisocial behavior, their children may be more likely to adopt similar behaviors. In addition, combinating crime prevention and the consequences of criminal behavior into the school curriculum can also raise awareness among adolescents. For instance, schools could implement a plethora of programs and speech associated with character education or life skills training so that they can foster a sense of responsibility, empathy, and lessen the likelihood of engaging in criminal activities.
In conclusion, although the idea of allowing such people to speak to teenagers can be a beneficial way to alarm them from breaking the law, I opine that some aforementioned steps could have a positive impact on children in the longer term.
- the charts below show the percentage of people using public transport and that ofpeople using private cars in five austrlian cities between 2000 and 2010 78
- the plans below show how the community centre looked like ten years ago before it was redesigned and how it looks now 11
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime to what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The given pie charts illustrate data about the percentages of expenditure of individuals on six different categories 11
- The charts below show the percentage of people using public transport and that of people using private cars in five Australian cities between 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where re 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44966442953 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01521598044 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634228187919 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.2207086599 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.636363636 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169542990702 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588025946368 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577513934166 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100844552356 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388759242973 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.