The use of mobile phones is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phones should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The obsession with mobile devices in contemporary society has led many to believe that phones are as detrimental as smoking. Therefore, we should prohibit the use of them in public areas. Despite the hazards that mobile phones have, I keenly disagree with this notion as phones are not damaging to humans the same way smoking is and they can enrich the conversations if utilized properly.
People are averse to phones as they can damage their social lives. With the ease of communication they offer, It’s not surprising that myriad people are dependent on it to socialize with others. Consequently, face-to-face gatherings are less frequent which may hazard our relationships with others. Furthermore, their addictive nature has caused people to use them even when they’re talking to someone in real life, thereby aggravating the problem. Many adolescents, for example, don’t mingle with others at a party owing to their preoccupation with phones.
However, I contend that the damage mobile devices cause is different from smoking. Smoking is directly detrimental to our health and well-being, whereas phones are adverse to our connections with others. The smoke from cigarettes not only affects smokers but also others who breathe it in. While phones may wreak havoc on our relations, it doesn’t involve other people in public.
Moreover, individuals can use phones to enhance their conversations. Mobile devices provide us with numerous party games, which we can make use of to make social gatherings more intriguing. The variety of the games they have also needed to be taken into account, as we can change the game if it gets tedious. To illustrate, the popularity of Mafia – a broad game – is on the rise as people now can play it without a physical copy using their phones.
In conclusion, although the hazards of mobile phones are undeniable, they aren’t as adverse to us as smoking is. Also, If utilized well, it can strengthen our connections with others. Thus, I keenly disagree with the proposition to bar those devices in public.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-09-08 | zhao_kangg | 78 | view |
2023-08-26 | Bigk016 | 70 | view |
2023-08-15 | nphan | 67 | view |
2023-08-09 | panekajizhongben | 78 | view |
2023-08-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about news However others believe that they can learn news more effectively through other media Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The best way to solve traffic and transportation problems is to encourage people to live in cities rather than suburbs or countryside To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programs to get news They get news about the world through the Internet Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Children today find it difficult to concentrate on or to pay attention to school What are the reasons How can we solve this problem 67
- More people today put their personal and private information online address telephone number credit card number to do everyday activities such as banking shopping and socializing Is this a positive or negative development 73
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 338 350
No. of Characters: 1658 1500
No. of Different Words: 179 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.288 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.905 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.688 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 130 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 82 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 48 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.789 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.135 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.737 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.315 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.536 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.101 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5