People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
"People who make decisons based on emotions and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers" this statement can be ambigous. Not all decisions based on emotions have gone wrong and also not all decisions which are deliberate have gone in proper way.
Each and every decision is situation dependent we need to analyze every bit of it and see through all aspects it has.
Although not every decision we make on emotion is baseless. This can be understood by precedent of a court case. In New York a judge named Ralls was being prosecuted for malfeasance although she knew it was on whim but her decision was something which would change lives of 100's of children. She was being prosecuted for deliberately changing her decision against given evidence which proved that the defendants were guilty and prosecution's claims were all legal and corroborate. Ralls overturned the decision in overnight, making a case aginst her. She did this because she knew about all wrongdoings which were happening during that time by prosecution. Like every other human she went to a lawyer to make stand for her case. She asked Mike to take her case, she explained everything to him and his partner about why she dropped those claims against defendants, drastically changing the decision and all other stuff. After giving an intense thought and goiing through all the files and story of her's Mike and his partner decided to take up the case. They went to trial. Mike presented the judge with an argument which was emotional, and had all juries trap in his act, his cause for defending was veracious. Taking everything into consideration trial was won by judge Ralls and she ws granted her judgeship back.
Sometimes, making decisions based on emotions are so, pointless that it would be waste of time to argue even against the person. We can understand this in much simpler way. This is a case of hti and run. John and Harvey are defendent and Jason is prosecutor. In this prosecutor makes a case against defendents client of hit and run, in this the client hit a person at night and left that person inn severe condition without any remorse. Jason anf and John have a little bit of history. John's parent were killed in an car accident whose case was handled by Jason. Knowing who prosectur is John takes the case personally acting on emotions without seeing any truths or facts he goes up and riles up gainst Jason, accusing of false charges. Jason knows he is acting on emotions and not thinking through he goes to Harvey and tells him to consider the deal he is giving to there client. Harvey considers and after sometime he considers the deal given by Jason. He explains John that the deal which was given was really good leading them to save their faces in court. Harvey explains "it is not good to
let your emotions get in your mind you need to think throught all of these things."
Making decisions is all based on situation. Not every decison we make based on emotion may put negative impact on outcome. Yes I agree with the given statement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | yixova3193 | 66 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | Aishwarya01 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them 54
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves 50
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for th 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and see through all aspects it has. Although not every decision we make on emotion i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 464, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
... any remorse. Jason anf and John have a little bit of history. Johns parent were killed in...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 515, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...of history. Johns parent were killed in an car accident whose case was handled by ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, really, so, mind you
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2555.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 534.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78464419476 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50873503791 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488764044944 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 796.5 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.1994482912 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1034482759 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4137931034 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.37931034483 5.21951772744 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293207626858 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807059897308 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133753623475 0.0758088955206 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198172998443 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.194876438359 0.0667264976115 292% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.