The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The age old question of man versus the machine, us humans have always pondered on this topic since forever and with new advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) this topic has been more relevant than ever. People have argued for both sides. Some say machines are superior and like the issue presented some say human minds are superior after all human are the ones who created the machines. I beg to differ; it is my belief that machines will not remain inferior --which is the case now-- to human forever and there will come a time when machines will far exceed human capability in every way possible. I will explain my position in three paragraphs below.
Yes, I have to acknowledge the fact that at this moment in current time human beings are superior to machines. We are the creators of machines; a machine is only as capable as the human who uses it and even with the recent advances in AI there is still a lot to be desire. Humans are far better in creativity, reasoning and humans have the ultimate ability to think and create new things which the machines of today lack. But it is this advantage or superiority we possess against the machines today that will ultimately be the reason for it to not stay this way forever. It is my belief that this ability to create, think and innovate which will allow us humans to create something that will ultimately exceed us.
Machines of today are already very good at doing certain tasks better than humans. This advantage they posses already makes them superior to humans at that particular task. For example, computers are can calculate complex equations and calculation astronomically faster than humans. How can we say we are superior while machines are clearly winning in certain tasks. And due to innovation, new machines are created what seems like always every month which are better than humans at a certain task. We are continuously losing grounds on what we’re better at everyday to machines and it will soon come a time when we are no longer able to say we are superior to machines.
Even if we consider the ability to think as the ultimate ability that is the determinant of superiority. Machines of today are not just created by one person, not even one country. Technology of today such as the internet and platforms like GitHub has allowed human beings to collaborate in the scale never imagined before. Development of today’s machines are backed by culmination of all brilliant human mind of the whole world. Research is being done at unprecedented rate in AI and machines. It is only a matter of time before researchers are able to create AI that has the ability of think for themselves and create and innovate likes us humans. This ability of machines will only be enchanted by the fact that machines are not limited by the biological limitation of the human and human mind. Machines have more longevity they can keep learning and innovating forever they are not fatigued. These advantages will inevitably lead machines to be superior to humans in the future.
To conclude, it is very clear that this is a complicated topic and good arguments can be made by both sides. While it is the case that human beings are superior to machines today. New machines that are better than human are specific tasks are created frequently. And ultimately because of the human’s ability to think, innovate and collaborate humans will eventually create a machine that can think like humans but with the lack of biological limitation of humans. This is why I believe that machines will not remain inferior to humans forever.
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In de 58
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positi 70
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village r 82
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend.Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom w 85
- Analytical Writing Assessment Question Claim Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system Reason Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts or minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 79
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... losing grounds on what we’re better at everyday to machines and it will soon come a tim...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...od arguments can be made by both sides. While it is the case that human beings are su...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, while, after all, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 44.0 19.5258426966 225% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2966.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 619.0 442.535393258 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7915993538 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98795655647 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56567327298 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.390953150242 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 997.2 704.065955056 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2464977159 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8666666667 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6333333333 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.93333333333 5.21951772744 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 10.2758426966 234% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309095386145 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102895259069 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687380286065 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215304922628 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466470715528 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... losing grounds on what we’re better at everyday to machines and it will soon come a tim...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...od arguments can be made by both sides. While it is the case that human beings are su...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, while, after all, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 44.0 19.5258426966 225% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2966.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 619.0 442.535393258 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7915993538 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98795655647 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56567327298 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.390953150242 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 997.2 704.065955056 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2464977159 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8666666667 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6333333333 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.93333333333 5.21951772744 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 10.2758426966 234% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309095386145 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102895259069 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687380286065 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215304922628 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466470715528 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.