A person's worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In this contemporary age, It is not uncommon among people to quickly judge an individual based on their social status without paying heed to their character and moral values. In the prompt, it is mentioned that such ethical and moral values are losing their importance nowadays. I strongly disagree with this statement for two key reasons.
To begin, a person's social status and wealth does not account for their good and pleasant behaviour in any social situation. Despite owning a huge amount of wealth, if a person does not treat other people with kindness and respect, he will not be valued in the society. Due to his disrespectful and insolent behaviour, he will be isolated and left alone by his peers. A disrespectful wealthy person will not be able to buy their way into earning respect and friendship from other people. So, moral values and good behaviour still has significance in this world and age.
Moreover, in every profession, ethical values are given equal importance along with the professional skills. If people cannot maintain integrity in their job, they will not be trusted by their employers and eventually will be ousted from the job. For instance, a professional working with clients' data should possess the integrity to keep the data confidential and his client also expects him to do so. Similarly, a doctor should possess the quality of handling his patient with utmost kindness and sympathy. Good skills can be easily learnt while integrity and moral values are quite rare among people.
To conclude, ethical and moral values are still considered to be a big influence in our society because social stuas and money cannot buy respect and friendship. Moreover, while hiring a professional for a job, his ethical value are still given importance alongside his skills.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-12-04 | tsln7607 | 56 | view |
2023-09-15 | Nowshin Tabassum | 61 | view |
2023-04-14 | tuyetsa2004@gmail.com | 73 | view |
2023-04-14 | tuyetsa2004@gmail.com | 67 | view |
2022-08-14 | ThanhNT | 89 | view |
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 70
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- The charts below show the average consumption of three nutrients by adults in the UK All of these nutrients may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write 11
- The bar chart below describes the gross domestic spending on Research and Development in five countries between 2001 and 2011 61
- The pie graphs below show the results of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which girls participate 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...ement for two key reasons. To begin, a persons social status and wealth does not accou...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 543, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to while'
Suggestion: to while
...pathy. Good skills can be easily learnt while integrity and moral values are quite ra...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oral values are still considered to be a big influence in our society because soc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, similarly, so, still, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07407407407 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64235336622 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538720538721 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2916196698 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.466666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192116603237 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695607299872 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0242092240644 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118698590439 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268208194499 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.