Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Since the rapid development of society, a various number of subjects which do not relate to the main direction have been included in academy programs. While some students believe that studying non-core material despite a wide number of main items is a captivating idea, others strongly consider that others firmly hold that this is superfluous. I strongly consider that studying extra courses is an inconsequential notion, unnecessary for core academic progress.
First of all, non-core subjects occupy a great part of the time, which students spend on their home tasks. Moreover, a large number of professors are strongly convinced that their subject is the most significant and important which is why their exercises are mostly very complicated. Due to this aspect, students spend too much time doing different tasks and learning skills which will not help them in their main direction. For example, I have three secondary courses history, philosophy and Russian language nevertheless the curious thing is that I am studying at a chemical and technological university. Thus, plenty of time trainees are forced to waste solely for credit.
Anyway, although some people think that learning other studies in addition to their major courses, I doubt it. Most of the leading lessons are terribly complicated and imply hard work and time for better understanding. Extra courses included in the schedule can in particular shoot down a person and cause a lot of problems as failing the exam or even worse. For instance, in my university, a large number of students are dismissed after the first session due to failure to pass PE class, which is not the main course. Hence, trainees can be best in their main sphere of education although they can be dismissed from university owing to not being professional subjects without a chance to pass the exam.
Taking everything into consideration it can be concluded that despite the fact that people should be broadly educated and institutions try to match these standards thousands of great people can be missed. That is why I believe that learning not main studies is unnecessary activity.
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 61
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction 67
- The best way to travel is travel in a group led by a tour guide To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The diagrams show a structure that is used to generate electricity from wave power Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ts spend on their home tasks. Moreover, a large number of professors are strongly convinced that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 393, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... worse. For instance, in my university, a large number of students are dismissed after the first ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y educated and institutions try to match these standards thousands of great peopl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, first, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in particular, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18497109827 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79076437541 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563583815029 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0092672453 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.6 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28352411661 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926220048172 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620165527317 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158410121926 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575316431896 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ts spend on their home tasks. Moreover, a large number of professors are strongly convinced that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 393, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... worse. For instance, in my university, a large number of students are dismissed after the first ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y educated and institutions try to match these standards thousands of great peopl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, first, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in particular, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18497109827 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79076437541 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563583815029 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0092672453 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.6 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28352411661 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926220048172 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620165527317 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158410121926 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575316431896 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.