Some people believe that traveling to and living in numerous places increases one's ability to relate and connect to other people. Others believe that this ability is better cultivated by living in one place and developing a deep understanding of that community.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
It is not uncommon for someone to argue that it is better to cultivate ability to connect to local people living in one place for a while than traveling to different places. Proponents for this view is that the more people stay in a city the more people will get adapted to local customs and culture. I agree with the statement.
Spending time in different cities do have benefits for people to relate to other people. The reason lies in the fact that different places have various culture which leads to people with distinguished personality. Chatting with people in numerous places needs traveler to get used to different language which enhance the speaking skills as well as broadening our horizons. It is impressive to find the similarities and difference between one community to another.
However, living in many cities for a short time stop people from having a deep understanding of one culture, and sometimes may get misunderstanding for a particular city. For example, one of my friends once traveled to my hometown, where he met a thief, and then he built a impression for the people in my city that they are poor and immoral. To be frank, as long as he stay for a period of time, he would find the thief is just a special example, as most people living there are ingenious and kind.
Moreover, the advantages living in one place compared to in numerous place is that people can have the chance to visit more places and connect to more person. Contrary to short trip that people will probably go to the famous places, long visit makes it possible for person to get to know various aspects in the city such as food, climate and building. In that case, people will have sufficient content to communicate with local people, and have a insight into their psychological word. For instance, for the first time I come to Hong Kong. I find people love to eat soup. As I live there for 3 months, I understand that it is the climate which is wet and hot contributes to the custom. Another merit is that as people can gradually pick up their language, finding it is easier to understand.
In conclusion, I believe it is beneficial to live in one place if people are interested in one distinct group of people. However, if people love to explore different culture, they can choose to go to many places. But the effect of getting insight into one city will be minimal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-09 | guozhishan | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-06 | AmieeZhao | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | Anish Sapkota | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | mana000 | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Umaima Khan | 66 | view |
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- Claim Though often considered an objective pursuit learning about the historical past requires creativity Reason Because we can never know the past directly we must reconstruct it by imaginatively interpreting historical accounts documents and artifacts W 58
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should co 50
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...where he met a thief, and then he built a impression for the people in my city th...
^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'stays'.
Suggestion: stays
...and immoral. To be frank, as long as he stay for a period of time, he would find the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
.... To be frank, as long as he stay for a period of time, he would find the thief is just a spec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 446, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...communicate with local people, and have a insight into their psychological word. ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65083135392 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61817634141 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467933491686 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 632.7 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2072822772 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.05 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341943336346 0.243740707755 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107769531575 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0958670784262 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208902629473 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464235696729 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.