Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world, people share the same fashions, advertising, brands, eating habits. Do you think that the advantage of this trend outweighs the disadvantage?
On the one hand, there are some minor positive impacts which can be derived from sharing the same preferences with people around the world. The first factors contributing to this is that people can easier follow a lifestyle when they have others to follow or be inspired. This is because it creates a connection or a community, which it can lead to mutual support, easier communication, and the ability to share tips, experiences, and resources. As far as the second idea is concerned, people following a same lifestyle will also have opportunities to be healthier or more beautiful, as they maintain the similar clothing and eating habits like others. This shared understanding can also lead to stronger networks, easier collaboration, and a greater sense of belonging, no matter where you are in the world.
Despite the aforementioned benefits, I believe that they pale in comparison with the downsides of sharing a common lifestyle. Regarding the first point, it may not be possible for people to maintain the same lifestyle. In fact, due to geographical differences, some habits may not be suitable for some people. For instance, people in Asian countries cannot have a diet with only Western food such as beef, pork for an extended period as they prefer rice and vegetable. As far as the second idea is concerned, having the similar living habits may lead to a loss of original traditional. The reason behind this is it replaces the cultural of the nation by uniform, global habits, causing traditional customs to fade away as they are no longer practiced or preserved. By following the same lifestyle with people around the world, the differences between countries gradually fade away.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-20 | ng duc minh | 56 | view |
| 2022-07-16 | ojehparvaz | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-01 | dantesw | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-11 | rajveerbooh2000@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-21 | Piyush Somani | 61 | view |
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 61
- Many people think that in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- Some people think that sending criminals to prison is not effective Education and job training should be used instead Do you agree or disagree 73
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[5]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'there are some minors'?
Suggestion: there are some minors
On the one hand, there are some minor positive impacts which can be derived f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...no matter where you are in the world. Despite the aforementioned benefits, I b...
^^^
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... Despite the aforementioned benefits, I believe that they pale in comparison wi...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, for instance, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05357142857 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89122308347 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546428571429 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7896885981 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.916666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163634326021 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646822272627 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465871086924 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131049916206 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00942868222245 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.