The graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in weathy countries, countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not.
The bar graph illustrates the average GDP for the three types of countries over a period of 30 years.
In general terms, there was a fluctuation in the proportion of GDP per decade.
It is clear from the bar chart show that in the 1960s, the figures for the wealthy countries accounted highest percentage about 5%. This figure is double that of the non-global countries and three times that of the globalisers countries. Nevertheless, this trend had changed significantly, the percentage of the globalisers's annual GDP doubled nearly 2,9% in the 1920s and there was also increase in the GDP of the non-global countries ( about 3,2%) while the wealthy countries fell considerably ( around 2,9%).
In the 1980s and 1990s, the trend for the wealthy countries continued falling to a low point about 2% at the end of this period. However, the figures for the globalisers increased dramatically to reached a peak at approximately 5% in the 1990s. In constract, the GDP percentage of the non-globalisers fell significantly in 1980s and only rose slightly in 1990s to about 1,4%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | cocolico14 | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | GulmiraKusajynkyzy | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | Tran Mai Phuong | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | Tran Mai Phuong | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-11 | Emmanuel Alvarez | 56 | view |
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 78
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing. What factors contribute to job satisfaction? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 84
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for this country. What are the reason? Solutions to change negative attitudes. 84
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph compares the percentage of theinternational and the percentage of UK student gaining second class degrees or better at a major UK university 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'accounted the highest'.
Suggestion: accounted the highest
..., the figures for the wealthy countries accounted highest percentage about 5%. This figure is dou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in the GDP of the non-global countries about 3,2% while the wealthy countries f...
^^
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the wealthy countries fell considerably around 2,9%. In the 1980s and 1990s, th...
^^
Line 4, column 320, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
... the non-globalisers fell significantly in 1980s and only rose slightly in 1990s to abou...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 352, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...icantly in 1980s and only rose slightly in 1990s to about 1,4%.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00561797753 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03616733429 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52808988764 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4114820144 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.375 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14425855633 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697068785644 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060429436923 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839602083272 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703851674794 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.