The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and char

Essay topics:

The following appeared as part of the Dean’s newsletter:

"The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students. We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well-rounded and charitable members of society. The proposed graduation requirement would be to complete at least 8 hours of unpaid community service per month for a total of 9 months. The Dean’s office will maintain a list of approved local charities on its website with contact information. This is a fantastic opportunity for students to give back to the community and gain real-world working experience. Most importantly, local charities in need will receive the help that they need to continue their efforts."

Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.

In the Dean's newsletter, the author tells that the University of Wabash proposed a graduation requirement for students to completed complete community service. The interest of the University is to provide community service and made it mandatory for the students 2 hours a month and 9 months with unpaid salary. This forced claim on the students would raise argument with several flaws mentioned in the newsletter. Nevertheless, the author's conclusion for the argument is with unwarrented assumptions, not convincing as it stands.

First of all, the author assumes that students should take course of community service compulsory and stated the number of hours should the students do the work monthly. the author should should know that, is it mandatory course or those who are interested only takes the course and come up with the conclusion.

Secondly, it is mentioned that the most charities is in need to help, we particularly do not know what king of help the charity requires, it may be food, proper shelter, or the funding the charity needed. The people in charity may not effort for their hospital bills, they may need discount for the amount the treatment is being made. The author assumes that local charities require from the students which does not hold water.

In addition, the author assumes that it is fantastic opportunity for students, but some students may not be willing to do charitable considering their academic work into effect. There may be some students who are interested, but they can work on their own to do any such social work for people

In conclusion, the argument is not persuasive as it stands, it contains several flaws. To bolster it further, the author should provide detailed theory .. with proper evidence. Furthermore, in order to make this charitable event effective, it is better to take students who are interested rather than making mandatory.

Votes
Average: 6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-25 Ruhani 58 view
2023-03-05 Shubhan Mital 74 view
2023-02-12 Sheikh Munim 65 view
2022-06-30 sag15 58 view
2022-04-02 harvey_elliot 55 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user tester93 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 433, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ed in the newsletter. Nevertheless, the authors conclusion for the argument is with unw...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...hould the students do the work monthly. the author should should know that, is it m...
^^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: should
...tudents do the work monthly. the author should should know that, is it mandatory course or th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 153, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...e author should provide detailed theory .. with proper evidence. Furthermore, in o...
^^
Line 9, column 156, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...uthor should provide detailed theory .. with proper evidence. Furthermore, in order ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in addition, in conclusion, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 55.5748502994 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 2260.96107784 70% => OK
No of words: 310.0 441.139720559 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12258064516 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7348358519 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 204.123752495 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509677419355 0.468620217663 109% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 705.55239521 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5874819622 57.8364921388 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.428571429 119.503703932 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 23.324526521 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.70786347227 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176134339025 0.218282227539 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636702400194 0.0743258471296 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730758559407 0.0701772020484 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899209401054 0.128457276422 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715927838821 0.0628817314937 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.3799401198 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 98.500998004 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 9 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 310 350
No. of Characters: 1540 1500
No. of Different Words: 149 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.196 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.968 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.63 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 121 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 84 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 64 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.846 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.64 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.615 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.369 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.635 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.1 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5