Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
This topic raises a issue of whether the takings from past to implement in the present decisions of leadership is useful or not. The crucial decisions to be made in higher order takes view from all the side. The prompt recommends that there is less use of past understanding to make decisions in the present. While the argument has both strengths and weaknesses to the topic. On balance, however, I strongly disagree that the taking view of the past is of less use for the present leaders and this essay will provide reasond for that.
Firstly, having idea about what happened in the past is crucial to make any serious decisions which involves about people. Decision should be taken quickly under considering the fact of loses which occured in the past due to the similar mistake.
For example, we have seen recent corona virus outbreak which has lead to huge disaster around the world because of the negligance from the china government and WHO, which caused lot of lives. Similar virus stain which is spreading in UK recently, the leaders from the UK government ordered a restriction due to that taking idea of what happended in the previously. Thus, taking such decisions from past is neccessary which makes them a good leader.
Further, taking decision on building any huge infrastructure, the leader should consider the pastly contructed and how this could have been done better. To make a proper plan which will lead to good built. For instance, the polavaram project being contructed in Andra Pradesh is facing lot of issue in its contructed, the dan has started around 2000 and still yet to finish due to lack of understanding and problems which they will face, if the have considered the previously built nagarjuna sagar dam and make decisions based on that and have wide area around it and it doesn't cause any trouble to people around them. Therefore, considering the pastly built infrastructure is also a important factor.
In conclusion, although many assume that pastly happened things are less use due to use lack of technology, I strong disagee with them as they are avoiding the fact that the possibility or importance taking considerations od making that decision which is crucial making current decisions and development. Therefore, taking use of past understanding is also important factor making crucial decisions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | Ruhani | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | prathiba_n | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | jayauen | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | Sheikh Munim | 50 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | bissu | 54 | view |
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 66
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won t benefit their future careers Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree 50
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of sidewalk rage similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The resul 80
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be 33
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and char 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
This topic raises a issue of whether the takings from past ...
^
Line 1, column 417, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...On balance, however, I strongly disagree that the taking view of the past is of l...
^^
Line 6, column 571, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that and have wide area around it and it doesnt cause any trouble to people aroun...
^^
Line 6, column 573, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...at and have wide area around it and it doesnt cause any trouble to people around them...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 684, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...the pastly built infrastructure is also a important factor. In conclusion, alt...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02051282051 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6879769809 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502564102564 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.2961355973 60.3974514979 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.375 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175400720953 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701976964698 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354458733621 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110339090653 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268932272262 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.