An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be paid subsidies for farming the new variety of millet. Since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, people will readily adopt the new variety. To combat vitamin A deficiency, the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Researchers have published a fact on Vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus. In response to this, An International Development organisation has engineered a new breed of millet high in Vitamin A. It is assumed that the new millet will help in ameliorating the Vitamin A deficiency.
However, there are various factors to be operationalised before making it a habitual millet in daily regimen. It is analysed that, the seeds of the millet are expensive. To mitigate the situation, Government has thought of subsidising farmers to farm the new variety of millet. Even though, government claim to its increasing adoption through this act; continuous efforts are required to make it part of the people diet.
Firstly, It is required to evaluate the production, sustainability and maintenance cost of new variety of millet. Even thought, farming is subsidised; final farm to market cost may be higher leading to higher millet cost than the cost of millet already available. which might lead to less adoption of the new variety of millet. Thus, overall cost should be attenuated before putting this in the market for consumption.
Furthermore, The taste might or might not be similar to the original millet. New variety of millet might be less tastier than the original one, causing it to be less preferred. This will refute the reason of it high adoption. The millet need to be perished with taste additives to obtain the acceptability of the new millet taste.
Is it completely digestible? Only when it is completely digestible, it might result in alleviating Vitamin A deficiency. Else, it might create digestion issues, resulting in unintended health issues. Causing, distress in people mind and hence an abnegation towards this new variety of millet. An amalgam of an additional supported digestive element with this new variety of millet might create a wholesome effective meal for people.
Lastly, Considering the fact that government of Tagus promote this new type of millet to combat vitamin A deficiency. People might consider this a political agenda to create a new market for costly millets, creating taxes benefits for government. This rising taxes might create an holding abeyance and rejection for new variety of millets.
Therefore, incapsulating all of the above postulations insinuate the possibility of predictable results only if the results comes out to favour the adoption of the new variety of millet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-20 | Dinesh4518 | 63 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Nowshin Tabassum | 69 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | Gnyana | 68 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Prasad002 | 59 | view |
| 2023-07-08 | tanvik21 | 74 | view |
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the Mayor of the city of Hillview In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town we should encourage Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area The Hillview landfill which has 59
- Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society especially among children Others believe that children s peer groups and parental role models are a much more powerful influence on children s beh 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...n the cost of millet already available. which might lead to less adoption of the new ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less tasty'?
Suggestion: less tasty
... millet. New variety of millet might be less tastier than the original one, causing it to be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arket for costly millets, creating taxes benefits for government. This rising tax...
^^
Line 11, column 280, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ernment. This rising taxes might create an holding abeyance and rejection for new ...
^^
Line 13, column 26, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...of millets. Therefore, incapsulating all of the above postulations insinuate the possib...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 117, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'results'' or 'result's'?
Suggestion: results'; result's
...lity of predictable results only if the results comes out to favour the adoption of the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, lastly, may, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 55.5748502994 108% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 2260.96107784 92% => OK
No of words: 394.0 441.139720559 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26395939086 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97867051442 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 204.123752495 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482233502538 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 705.55239521 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7975744938 57.8364921388 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.4166666667 119.503703932 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4166666667 23.324526521 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.70786347227 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.15768463074 136% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.67664670659 214% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487400161015 0.218282227539 223% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149280179935 0.0743258471296 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106103114617 0.0701772020484 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251655107268 0.128457276422 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152490796945 0.0628817314937 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.5979740519 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 98.500998004 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...n the cost of millet already available. which might lead to less adoption of the new ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less tasty'?
Suggestion: less tasty
... millet. New variety of millet might be less tastier than the original one, causing it to be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arket for costly millets, creating taxes benefits for government. This rising tax...
^^
Line 11, column 280, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ernment. This rising taxes might create an holding abeyance and rejection for new ...
^^
Line 13, column 26, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...of millets. Therefore, incapsulating all of the above postulations insinuate the possib...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 117, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'results'' or 'result's'?
Suggestion: results'; result's
...lity of predictable results only if the results comes out to favour the adoption of the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, lastly, may, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 55.5748502994 108% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 2260.96107784 92% => OK
No of words: 394.0 441.139720559 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26395939086 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97867051442 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 204.123752495 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482233502538 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 705.55239521 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7975744938 57.8364921388 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.4166666667 119.503703932 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4166666667 23.324526521 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.70786347227 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.15768463074 136% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.67664670659 214% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487400161015 0.218282227539 223% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149280179935 0.0743258471296 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106103114617 0.0701772020484 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251655107268 0.128457276422 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152490796945 0.0628817314937 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.5979740519 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 98.500998004 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.