"Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women into space. Therefore, we should invest our resources in unmanned space flight."
The argument concludes that aeronautics should invest their resources in unmanned space flight. The conclusion is based upon the premises that manned space flights are costly and dangererous, and unmanned space probes/satellites have demonstrated that a great deal of information can be gathered without the costs and risks of sending humans into space. However, the argument's reasoning is flawed as it take several assumptions that are not correctly justified.
Firstly, the argument fails to consider the fact that though manned space flight might be costly, the return on investment might be good enough to compensate. The conclusion assumes that the cost component of the manned space flights cannot be justified with their success. Not only this, the author assumes that the information gathered from the unmanned space flights is exhaustive and no other benefit can come out of from sending humans to space.
Also, the author's conclusion is based on the assumption that there is no possibility of reducing the costs and risks associated with the manned space mission with any technological advancement.
In conclusion, the argument that aeronautics should invest resources in unmanned space flight is flawed. If the author demonstated that cost of manned mission is not compensated by proportionate return, the information gathered by unmanned mission is exhaustive and there is no possibility of technological advancement, the argument will considerbly strenghthen. However in its current form it would not be correct to accept the argument.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | Krisha Lakhani | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | riyarmy | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Anish Sapkota | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | BusariMoruf | 55 | view |
- “The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.” 33
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village r 51
- The following is from a memo from the advertising director of the Super screen Movie Production Company.According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other 30
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
- Learning is primarily a matter of personal discipline; students cannot be motivated by school or college alone. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 11, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...sending humans to space. Also, the authors conclusion is based on the assumption t...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 364, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... argument will considerbly strenghthen. However in its current form it would not be cor...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 55.5748502994 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 2260.96107784 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 238.0 441.139720559 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57142857143 5.12650576532 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.56307096286 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03584731179 2.78398813304 109% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 204.123752495 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491596638655 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 705.55239521 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 19.7664670659 51% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6645035088 57.8364921388 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.6 119.503703932 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 23.324526521 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.70786347227 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44768528513 0.218282227539 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18009725117 0.0743258471296 242% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148379390223 0.0701772020484 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287489765261 0.128457276422 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10724537393 0.0628817314937 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.3799401198 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.3550499002 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.5979740519 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.32208582834 103% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 98.500998004 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.