Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
The residents of a certain cow flu affected area might be already in contact with a diseased person, or are diseased themselves or may live in the terror of the cow flu. In such grave times, it is the responsibility of the concerned authorities to help the people in need by providing vaccinations, pain-relief medicines, food, shelter and so on. While there stands a small possibility that a person may die from the inoculation, few key concerns need to be answered for the authorities to take a firm decision.
The author mentions a small possibility of death from such inoculations and might be assuming certain factors, and the question arises, how small of a possibility is it? What are the exact number of diseased, recovered cases and people who faced death due to this inoculation? And what were the medical conditions of the deceased? The small possibility of death needs to be quantified and all the concerned authorities must be held responsible for the ineffectiveness of the inoculation. When such questions are answered, only then can the small possibility be tested against and authorities would be certain to take up necessary actions.
Again, while the small possibility lies, another major question can be asked, which is, what are the concerned medical boides doing to make the inoculation one hundered percent effective and what preventive measures are being given to tackle any and all side effects of the vaccine? What were the experimentations and research done by the health-care bodies who developed this inoculation against cow flu and what were their success rates and observations for the deployment of this vaccination? If the health-care bodies who developed this inoculation, deployed it at a lower success rate then they need to be held responsible for the deaths of the those people.
Lastly, for a cow flu diseased person who is suffering in pain, and quite possibly is facing imminent death. For such a person, the chance that the inoculation could heal him or her from the cow flu disease is much more valued than the risk of an unfortunate death. The medical bodies must examine the patients and the effectiveness of the vaccine on a case-by-case study, taking into account the medical condition of the patient and actual effect of the vaccine. By providing more detail and research on patient's previous medical health, only then can the authorities firmly administer the provisioning of the inoculations in the disease affected areas.
There seems to be a lot of ambiguity in the author's perception of the effectiveness of the vaccine whereas the experimentation and research done by the health-care bodies also need to be verified for the deaths of the people, and whether the deaths were in fact caused by the vaccine or whether the patient already had a dire medical health. To measure the effectiveness of the vaccine and unsurface the small possibility of deaths due to the vaccine, authorities should focus towards statistical measures rather than public sentiments and fears.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-29 | dkim1206 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | wcfr | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | riyarmy | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Nowshin Tabassum | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Mizanur_Rahman | 55 | view |
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 78
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 79
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 58
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 54
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 9 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 10 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 498 350
No. of Characters: 2482 1500
No. of Different Words: 217 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.724 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.984 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.959 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 175 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 136 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 96 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 68 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29.294 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.714 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.529 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.362 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.582 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.121 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...e seems to be a lot of ambiguity in the authors perception of the effectiveness of the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, may, so, then, whereas, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.6327345309 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 11.1786427146 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 28.8173652695 52% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 55.5748502994 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2535.0 2260.96107784 112% => OK
No of words: 498.0 441.139720559 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09036144578 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.56307096286 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00578800585 2.78398813304 108% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 204.123752495 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449799196787 0.468620217663 96% => OK
syllable_count: 804.6 705.55239521 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.8473053892 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.0714978483 57.8364921388 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.117647059 119.503703932 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2941176471 23.324526521 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.29411764706 5.70786347227 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251025486402 0.218282227539 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954384390289 0.0743258471296 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630254061038 0.0701772020484 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152622191711 0.128457276422 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590156023427 0.0628817314937 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.3799401198 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.3550499002 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 98.500998004 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 12.3882235529 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.1389221557 122% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.