People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Decision-making can be considered to be one of the highlighted points in one's life. As the decision made can eventually lead to life-changing events. Hence, one needs to be a thinker on the decisions they make on different scales. Those who are swayed by their emotions in decision-making generally lead to a shorter happiness achieving outcome and potentially later regret. But not all who choose by emotion end up in regret and hence I discuss two important points that detail this delicate topic.
To rely on your gut feeling all the time is definitely the way of the brave and dumb, but to always rely on your logic can be tricky as it involves the correctness of one's logic. For example, two different people who are thinkers in their own respect can arrive at different conclusions about a particular situation. This can be two engineers arguing the brilliantness of their solution to the problem at hand. While both solutions lead to a general closure but one might have a slight advantage over the other in terms of reliability or ease. So even when we depend on our logic, we could end up making different decisions and what decision leads to overall happiness for someone is very subjective.
Life is always uncertain, right from birth! There are numerous factors that attribute to the way of life we live and desire, shaping our minds and essentially our thinking logic. In certain cases, it may result in that even after much deliberation on a choice, we do not end up getting what we wanted or rather we end up getting something exactly opposite of what we hoped for. For example, a college entering student after putting much thought into their course major chooses the one with the highest job prospects but soon after employment finds themselves in a pit of wet sand trying to get out of the intense job pressure and tough competition.
Much like Schrodinger's cat experiment, you'll never know if the cat is alive or dead until you open the box. We can never be one hundred per cent sure of the outcome of our choices until we make those choices. But someone who runs by emotions and tries to justify later with logic is simply clearing themselves out of blame and responsibility and thus called upon as a poor decision maker since not much thought was put into the action. One who keeps a balance of both can see the benefits of both as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | Aishwarya01 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-14 | RIYA MODI | 58 | view |
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 79
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 54
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 78
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... to be one of the highlighted points in ones life. As the decision made can eventual...
^^^^
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...of the highlighted points in ones life. As the decision made can eventually lead t...
^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ricky as it involves the correctness of ones logic. For example, two different peopl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ogic. For example, two different people who are thinkers in their own respect can arriv...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: you'll
... Much like Schrodingers cat experiment, youll never know if the cat is alive or dead ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, thus, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 416.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69230769231 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67775945709 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550480769231 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0756409562 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.823529412 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4705882353 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23529411765 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256188484723 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863684840021 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09074350744 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163545065096 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0966001078155 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.