All cities should devote at least five percent of their budgets to programs that preserve and
protect existing parks.
Parks, by definition, is a place for leisure, amusement and enjoyment. Some would argue that all cities should budget for programs that ensure parks preservation. But others would state that all cities should not invest in program that enhance parks preservation. After weighing the evidence, it is certain that cities should budgets for programs that see to the proper maintenance of parks.
Those who would argue that it is not essential for cities to budgets for programs that ensure parks maintenance may point to the fact that the charges put forward by the parks organization in order to make use of them are sufficient to budget for the parks maintenance. However, this is not the case as people who make use of the parks are so small in number compare to the city population.
Programs about city parks create awareness for park usefulness. People need to be enlighten on the importance of park; this will ensure large number of people to make use of the park which commensurate to large amount of money realized from parks. Investment in these kinds of program is a smart choice and is necessary.
Futhermore, some of the city residents might see programs as not being necessary so it might seem to discard it. However, putting the programs forward is better than not making it available. Hence, programs should be encourage.
In conclusion, it’s clear that cities should budgets for programs that enable proper maintenance of parks. Awareness of parks important through programs enhances large park user which in turns generate large amount of money sufficient enough for park maintenance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-03 | BusariMoruf | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | sheryl dsouza | 50 | view |
| 2021-06-11 | June_1108 | 66 | view |
| 2021-04-18 | rishitha981@gmail.com | 58 | view |
| 2021-04-17 | ulligadda sreeja | 58 | view |
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildl 47
- The first step to self knowledge is rejection of the familiar 50
- All cities should devote at least five percent of their budgets to programs that preserve and protect existing parks 50
- The following was written as part of a study weighing the benefits of a new construction project in the city of Winterville Car racing is extremely popular in the city of Winterville over 20 000 Winterville residents attended the state s annual 500 lap ra 70
- Technology causes more problems for modern societies than it solves 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parks'' or 'park's'?
Suggestion: parks'; park's
...act that the charges put forward by the parks organization in order to make use of th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parks'' or 'park's'?
Suggestion: parks'; park's
...f them are sufficient to budget for the parks maintenance. However, this is not the c...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: small
...people who make use of the parks are so small in number compare to the city population. Pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...choice and is necessary. Futhermore, some of the city residents might see programs as no...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encouraged'?
Suggestion: encouraged
...it available. Hence, programs should be encourage. In conclusion, it’s clear that cities...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, may, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 2235.4752809 60% => OK
No of words: 265.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09056603774 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65483431638 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 215.323595506 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464150943396 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.9 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.8605526616 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3571428571 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07142857143 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277684651023 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128041880698 0.0831039109588 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809933699725 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18067816527 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563903867006 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 100.480337079 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.