The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
The statement above would suggest that the character of the society as a whole is to be dictated by the actions of those the people choose as their heroes or role models. This is a maxim that I strongly agree with. Though it may seem that the above statement abolishes the idea of individual identity, it should be understood that the person in question that is being considered over here is a person with whom the majority identify themselves with based on their views on certain issues or values.
Looking at historic examples, Dr. Martin Luther king, Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, these are some of the people who are widely recognized for their action against oppressive regimes during their time. Despite, these people being recognized by the communities who may have been much more polarized and aggressive in asserting their opinions, these leaders were characters with great moral fortitude and were able to not only successfully represent their communities but also influence values and character of these communities. So, we should understand that the recognized leader or role model is not only and refection of the society, but also has influence over the community itself.
Furthermore, we should also recognize that this role of representation can come from unexpected sources. A prime example would be, Greta Thunberg the 15-year-old Swedish climate activist, who is one of the most influential speakers on the topic now. This is a girl who was recognized by the community for her passion and dedication to fight for the same. If, we are to look closely to her action it is apparent that she understands the importance of her position the and has used to voice the concerns of the community unfettered by the action of large corporations and interest groups. This also reinforces the idea that individual identity is not being suppressed by holding one person accountable but rather it has been augmented by association.
Examining the idea presented here we can also interpret that the statement can be used to refer to a wide variety of people form recognized military personal to private citizens who have the ability to sway the public opinion one way or another due to certain actions in their past. This encompasses a large group of people who may not necessarily be the epitome of moral values or character and can be used to smear the reputation of the community. Therefore, we should limit our recognition of said representative to people who have weighed in on social and political issues that shape the society and hence are a good representation of the same.
In conclusion, it can be said that indeed that we the character of the society can be assessed by looking closely at the actions of the few that are chosen by the society to represent them. This holds true because, the relation between the community and the recognized works both ways i.e.; the community as a whole is represented by the leader/role model and the leader/role model is also able to influence the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | Zahid6400 | 66 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | LauraTing | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Isolus | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 83 | view |
- Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy. At the same time, manufacturers are now marketing many home appliances, such as refrigerators and air conditioners, that are almost twice as energy efficient as th 42
- Workers in the small town of Leeville take fewer sick days than workers in the large city of Masonton, 50 miles away. Moreover, relative to population size, the diagnosis of stress-related illness is proportionally much lower in Leeville than in Masonton. 89
- We can usually learn more from people whose views we share than from whose views contradict our own 83
- Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal. Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own 70
- Because of declining profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore's ten movie-rental stores. Raising prices is not a good option, since we are famous for our low prices. Instead, we should reduce our operating hours. Last month our store in 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uggest that the character of the society is to be dictated by the actions of thos...
^^
Line 1, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir views on certain issues or values. Looking at historic examples, Dr. Martin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...hatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, these are some of the people who are widely recognized for th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 593, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'we'?
Suggestion: the; we
...porations and interest groups. Here, to the we see that the idea of individual identit...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 656, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are a good representation of the same. In conclusion, we can say that indeed th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, look, may, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2490.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 504.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94047619048 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77725618686 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462301587302 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 814.5 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.7447461056 60.3974514979 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.625 118.986275619 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5 23.4991977007 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128701370321 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04992446758 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703183604303 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868314215313 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510982504298 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.