Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Education has a very role in shaping a person's life. It is through education that a person learns basic building blocks of life, which in turn is the defines the personality. A person becomes aware of his or her likes or dislikes, strragth and weaknesses, etc while going through the process of education. Responsilibilty of providing righteous education to students falls greatly on educational institutions, as compared to other factors contributing to growth of the student.
Every education institution has its own way of teaching and grading its students. All the students are graded based a common criteria. Those who have good grades are regarded as intelligent while those who have less grades are regarded as dull. But, every student studying in these institution is unique. He or she has his or her own strengths and weakness, likes and dislikes, own opinions and perspective and dreams. Some of the these factors are highlighted, if the institution has a very effective grading system. But, most of times the grading system don't fully consider these unique factors of the individual. Hence, in my opinion, the educational institutions should only have responsility of suggestting which fields the student should persue to succeed in future. Moreover, success has different meaning and defination for different individuals. So, it would not be good for individual's growth, if his point of view on things in not taken into consideration.
We all the famous story from Panchatantra, where all the animals where given same training and were graded based upon the same skills. Story describes how fishes were train to fly, birds where trained to swim, etc. In the end, these animals got less grades in the skills that were expert of. So, even though a bird had good grades in swimming, he cannot and should persue swimming for life, as it is against his interests and personality. The process followed by Educational institutes are somewhat similar and hence yeild in similar results for some inidividuals.
If a student pursue field of study based upon analysis of educational institutions, it will result in supressing the student's natural talent and interests. In future, even if the student is at the apex of success, he or she might not get the satisfication and happiness, one should experience through work. So, it is very necessary for an individual to pursue a field of study that he or she enjoys working in.
I conclude this with my opinion, that educational institutions should not dissuade students from pursuing fields of study which the institute thinks is not good for the students. There are many factors that should be taken into consideration while persueing a feild of study and the analysis of educational institutions do not take all the factors into account. Educational institutions should only have responsiblity to suggest feilds to the students which they can per
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 58
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 60
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppor 50
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual s levels of stimulation The study showed that in stimulating situat 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
Education has a very role in shaping a persons life. It is through education that a pe...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
... the students are graded based a common criteria. Those who have good grades are regarde...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun grades is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ded as intelligent while those who have less grades are regarded as dull. But, every...
^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this institution' or 'these institutions'?
Suggestion: this institution; these institutions
...as dull. But, every student studying in these institution is unique. He or she has his or her own...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...wn opinions and perspective and dreams. Some of the these factors are highlighted, if the i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the times') or simply say ''most times''.
Suggestion: most of the times; most times
...s a very effective grading system. But, most of times the grading system dont fully consider ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
.... But, most of times the grading system dont fully consider these unique factors of ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 763, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ds the student should persue to succeed in future. Moreover, success has different meanin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'trained'.
Suggestion: trained
...skills. Story describes how fishes were train to fly, birds where trained to swim, et...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'flying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: flying
.... Story describes how fishes were train to fly, birds where trained to swim, etc. In t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun grades is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...wim, etc. In the end, these animals got less grades in the skills that were expert o...
^^^^
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the future'?
Suggestion: In the future
... students natural talent and interests. In future, even if the student is at the apex of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, so, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2435.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13713080169 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92520495843 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485232067511 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 761.4 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.330437983 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.96 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.21951772744 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209155239085 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062838033641 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797602393904 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128387689511 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832396735244 0.0667264976115 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.