Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from
pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed
In today’s modern world the students have in front of them a plethora of options in terms of study choices. Some of these fields are saturated in terms of research or future scope while the other options are upcoming and have a wide scope in future. Taking this into account it is imperative that the students make the right choice that they choose not a diminishing but an upcoming career option albeit the one in which they are likely to succeed. In this the Educational Institutions have a huge role to play and I am in agreement with the statement which says that educational institutions should have a responsibility to dissuade students from the taking up the fields of Study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Students today are exposed to the world of social media from a very young age and when it comes to making a choice in taking up their field of study it is likely that they might be having some pre conceived notions about a particular field from the social media without actually verifying the information. Here the job of educational institutions comes into play. They can help the student in analyzing his strengths and the relative study choices thereby arousing his interest in that subject due to which he will be successful in that field.
- Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument The following appeared in a memorandum from the new president of the Patriot car manufactu 66
- The following is a memo given to the residents of a housing complex Studies show that in 70 percent of traffic accidents at least one driver involved is less than 10 miles from home when the accident occurs This statistic indicates that drivers have a ten 78
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 66
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 33
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ions are upcoming and have a wide scope in future. Taking this into account it is imperat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 334, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'institutions'' or 'institution's'?
Suggestion: institutions'; institution's
...nformation. Here the job of educational institutions comes into play. They can help the stud...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 2235.4752809 47% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 222.0 442.535393258 50% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72522522523 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.55969084622 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61489881332 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 215.323595506 54% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527027027027 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 704.065955056 48% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 20.2370786517 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.9955907089 60.3974514979 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.857142857 118.986275619 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7142857143 23.4991977007 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.97078651685 40% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.498427904079 0.243740707755 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.208370479399 0.0831039109588 251% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.175817877245 0.0758088955206 232% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.38433255962 0.150359130593 256% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107400356102 0.0667264976115 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 100.480337079 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.