Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
All around the world, it is the governments' responsibility to present a better life for their people. Almost every government faces different problems, some immediate ones and some will be expected in the future. As far as I am concerned, I think that the Governments should try to solve current problems in their country. The reasons why I believe so will be elaborated upon hereunder.
First of all, by solving current problems, people's quality of life will be better immediately. I mean, when there is a problem in an area, such as traffic and noise in one city, the government cannot ignore it by the excuse that: we are trying to solve future problems. I think they should immediately get to work and try their best to solve the problem by ways such as improving the public transportation through increasing the number of city trains or busses. This way, people will not have to live in a bad environment for a long time.
Furthermore, when the government does not solve people's emergent problems, they start to lose hope and faith in their authorities. People will think that the government does not think about them at all and is concerned with other issues, such as corruption, nepotism, and so on. I think this is very important. This way, people either get mad at the government and start riots, which can harm the country's appearance in general, or will they become reluctant to take part in elections. Actually, that is what has happened in my country. When people do not want to participate in such elections, there is a greater chance that the government would fall into the hands of a dictator.
On the other hand, when the government is concerned with anticipated problems in the future, there is a better chance to solve more critical problems that the whole country will face in the future. To explain it more, when the government wants to solve immediate problems, since these problems are usually faced with in some particular parts of the country, this will benefit only a portion of the society. If the government tries to see the future, although people may live in hardship in some areas for a brief time, the country will be in a better position in the future. That is why I think the idea of looking to solve future problems is not a totally wrong idea.
In conclusion, I think that the benefits of solving immediate problems by governments outweigh the idea of concentrating on solving the anticipated issues. By solving current challenges, people's lives get better in a short period of time, and people will always stay loyal and sanguine about their country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-11 | guozhishan | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | sami18 | 79 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | shekhar | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 50 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities Use sp 70
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- TPO 56 80
- The neighbors are people who live near us In your opinion what type of neighbor is the best to have Someone who is quiet Someone who we are similar to Someone who is supportive Use specific details and examples in your answer 70
- Tpo 38In 1995 a microscopic fungus called Phytophthora ramorum or P ramorum was first detected in the forests of the western United States P ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees in many infected oaks leaves with 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
All around the world, it is the governments responsibility to present a better life...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...es, peoples lives get better in a short period of time, and people will always stay loyal and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, furthermore, if, look, may, so, as for, i mean, i think, in conclusion, in general, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2146.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79017857143 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69749269447 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459821428571 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 660.6 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4637240814 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.3 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240092355406 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838019786411 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762681412451 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158294950061 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477514938971 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.