Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today
The World is changing too fast in the twenty-first century and brings new sets of problems which either does not exist or not a potential problem in past. Such problems have required experts to think in different ways than before. However, there are many problems exist today for which looking into retrospect may help to solve problems. Instability in the economy, court cases, relations with other countries, etc are examples of reoccurring problems to address such problems history may help to take the decision today. Thus I cannot totally agree with the provided statement.
Some of the major problems of this century are global warming, pollution, preservation of the environment, conventional jobs are being consumed by machines and artificial intelligence and many more. Though these problems require making decisions for which there is no historical context exists. For instance, excessive use and disposition of plastic is one of major problem faced today. But it was not a potential problem back into the 19th century. Thus looking for guidance back into past to make decision will be useless.
There are various factors which one should consider while making important decisions. And these factor changes with time and their relative important also varies as a result of advancement in thoughts, culture, and technology. So in this situation knowing about the past may not help one to make decisions. For example, in past, there was no place for human rights of criminals and thus they are beheaded publically even for stealing and other silly crimes. But today punishment of death is performed with cautions. So while making the judgment of such case by arbiter does not get much help from looking back in history.
Nevertheless one cannot deny that knowing about the past can help people to make decisions in some situations. For instance disputes between states regarding the distribution of water of river passing through both states can be solved by studying such disputed ever existed in past between states of that country. In this regards knowing history can be proved useful for decision making. Thus by referring past person can make a sound decision and more likely to get anticipated results.
Thus knowing about the past can help one to make critical decisions but one should not totally rely on past to make decision. The person should check validity of decision-based on past in today's situation. In sum knowing past can definitely help to make the decision and anticipate results in certain situations if not all.
- According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies act 29
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flue were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot perm 63
- Some people claim that you can tell whether a nation is great by looking at the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientist. Others argue that the surest indicator of a great nation is , in fact, the general welfare of all its people. 66
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimul 23
- The main purpose of any company or business organisation is to increase profit. A profit can only be increased by improving productivity and efficiency of various departments within an organisation. Thus, most of companies often hire outside consultants a 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...es not exist or not a potential problem in past. Such problems have required experts to...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 470, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'problems'' or 'problem's'?
Suggestion: problems'; problem's
...of reoccurring problems to address such problems history may help to take the decision t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 524, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ry may help to take the decision today. Thus I cannot totally agree with the provide...
^^^^
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
... agree with the provided statement. Some of the major problems of this century are glob...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...elp one to make decisions. For example, in past, there was no place for human rights of...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 518, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nt of death is performed with cautions. So while making the judgment of such case by arb...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
... help from looking back in history. Nevertheless one cannot deny that knowing about the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 390, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...n be proved useful for decision making. Thus by referring past person can make a sou...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2145.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1686746988 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63728967883 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518072289157 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4526423571 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2608695652 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0434782609 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30434782609 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420731852897 0.243740707755 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127584632274 0.0831039109588 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12820980315 0.0758088955206 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245054414592 0.150359130593 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121106330463 0.0667264976115 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.