Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quantities of information and find what’s important.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In todays modern world, Mass media and Internet are the biggest and strongest mean to communicate with the audience. Articles found on internet about any thing may be right or wrong but it surely affects the state of mind if an individual. In my opinion I disagree with the statement that the mass media and internet have caused people’s attention span to be shorter. I support my position with the following two points.
To begin with, the content found on the internet is vast, one can find articles related to anything anywhere at just a click. For Example - Earlier there where newspaper which consisted of articles and news related mostly to their state only, to know about different state there where separate newspaper but mostly confined to their regional language. So one cannot read much from that newspaper. All these newspaper also cost money. Now since the internet has come all these articles are made available on the internet we can also read news about other state in your language. By these we come to know that internet and mass media have caused people’s attention span wider rather than shorter. Now a days new apps are getting launched in which one can be updated about what going on in their country in just 1 hr. These things surely proof’s that internet is a great piece of resource taking medium.
In addition, Since there is a large amount of data present in the internet today, people can now focus more on different variety of news. For example - As said earlier that news about different state is made available on the internet thus giving people a lot of quantity of information, this will not lead to people focusing on one idea only rather it will help them to choose what people want to read and what not. This shows that because of internet people will not focus on one thing rather they will have options to choose what they want to read.
In contrast, Internet and mass media are boon in may respects but they are also a bane at some parts. Due to giving resources freely on the internet make it a bane as children who are younger in age for them it could not be a right time to see news about murder or visit pronography sites. Making proper restrictions on such things will make the internet surely a boon for the world.
In conclusion, Mass media and internet cannot constraint the attention span of people in any respect rather they would expand it. The Internet has a variety of things which will help people to choose only what they like. Some drawbacks of the internet are surely present but proper ways can be developed in order to make it a good place for information gathering.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-19 | Adesina Boluwatito | 58 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | haemanth10 | 66 | view |
| 2022-10-05 | asm01 | 58 | view |
| 2022-09-30 | anil paltya | view | |
| 2022-07-09 | sally_tt | 66 | view |
- Mass media and the internet have caused people s attention spans to get shorter However the overall effect has been positive while people are less able to focus on one thing they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quan 58
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e mail correspondence Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity as well as protect the company from lawsuits Write a response in which you discu 66
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address 50
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 50
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school Last year Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor Swift Nutrition This company serves low fat low calorie meals th 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
...ience. Articles found on internet about any thing may be right or wrong but it surely aff...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... anywhere at just a click. For Example - Earlier there where newspaper which cons...
^^
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this newspaper' or 'these newspapers'?
Suggestion: this newspaper; these newspapers
...nnot read much from that newspaper. All these newspaper also cost money. Now since the internet...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 697, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
...tention span wider rather than shorter. Now a days new apps are getting launched in which ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 701, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...ion span wider rather than shorter. Now a days new apps are getting launched in which ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iety of things which will help people to choose only what they like. Some drawbac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2177.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 466.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67167381974 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33562061119 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444206008584 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 682.2 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4195509752 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1904761905 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318490278832 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106887821218 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828966827676 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194845876726 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441341500994 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.