People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author states that people who make decisions based on emotions and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. People who take decisions based on their emotions are always considered puerile; which also shows that they poor in decision making. I concord with this statement for the following reasons.
Our brain is highly perceptive to various types of stimuli: emotional or physical. The reaction or response time to different situations is varied for different people. Some individuals have increased promptness, and presence of mind, whereas others are comparatively slower. It is observed that when confronted with a arduous situation, the brain undergoes an overwhelming set of byzantine emotions, directed by the neural signalling processes. In such situations keeping an aplomb mind and being composed is a difficult feat to achieve. Although it is said that with regular meditation and other wellness practices, this can be achieved.
Individuals who take precipitous decisions in their current state of mind, be it doleful or choleric states, can be definitely lead to grave consequences. The denouement of such events would definitely be regretful. As it is said in various studies that, a sudden influx of emotions can be overbearing on the brain and it would not be able to think matters with a limpid mind. Decisions taken in such unsteady periods would not be clearly thought after.
However, there are some people who corroborate their capricious decisions taken during such intensive times, and this undoubtedly makes them poor decisions makers. This clearly highlights that they are trying to defend their untenable act(s) by giving some reasoning which does not make sense logically. The reason why these individuals could be labelled as poor decision makers is because they tend to take hasty decisions and then cover up their acts by maintaining lousy reasons.
Let's take an example of the company Monsanto which has been in various legal disputes regarding its product Roundup. This herbicide has been clearly been flagged as a product which has a component that induces cancer, specifically lymphoma, in many people. When various such reports were arising in different parts of America, the company did not study through these case reports and instead continued the sale of Roundup. In this case study, the company was committed to save its name and hence, justified all its products to be clean with just the right amount of chemicals that would just target the insects. For the most part of the last ten years, the company kept on justifying their ingredients, if an immediate action would have been taken in the first few cases itself, the company could have saved many lives, and also saved a lot of lawsuit money.
In recapitulation, I would like to confirm that individuals who take precipitous decisions based on their current state of emotions are not capable of handling their inclement emotions and hence, should not take any hasty decisions. Such decisions would definitely be regretful. In addition, justifying those emotions later would flag you as a poor decision maker who cannot handle the emotional upheaval.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-14 | RIYA MODI | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | vishva24 | 50 | view |
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news During the same time period most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with th 78
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 68
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 70
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t is observed that when confronted with a arduous situation, the brain undergoes ...
^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... acts by maintaining lousy reasons. Lets take an example of the company Monsanto...
^^^^
Line 9, column 727, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...eir ingredients, if an immediate action would have been taken in the first few cases itself, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 860, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and also saved a lot of lawsuit money. In recapitulation, I would like to confi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, regarding, so, then, well, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2683.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 510.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26078431373 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70510147869 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505882352941 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 827.1 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2591285908 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.791666667 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331155278182 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995861137224 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117965314763 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199229838332 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164981139633 0.0667264976115 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 100.480337079 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t is observed that when confronted with a arduous situation, the brain undergoes ...
^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... acts by maintaining lousy reasons. Lets take an example of the company Monsanto...
^^^^
Line 9, column 727, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...eir ingredients, if an immediate action would have been taken in the first few cases itself, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 860, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and also saved a lot of lawsuit money. In recapitulation, I would like to confi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, regarding, so, then, well, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2683.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 510.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26078431373 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70510147869 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505882352941 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 827.1 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2591285908 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.791666667 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331155278182 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995861137224 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117965314763 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199229838332 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164981139633 0.0667264976115 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 100.480337079 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.