People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Sometimes we are overwhelmed with emotions, be it excessively happy or nettled. In this situations, we are not in the normal state of mind and are out actions are highly influenced by the enzimes that are released due to harmones, like dopamine when you are happy. In situations like these, it is highly recommended not to take any decision under such influence. I strongly agree with the autor's claim that the people who make decision under the influence of emotions and later try to justify such emotions are infact poor decision makers as they prove to have no control over their emotional intelligence.
Firstly, it is a general fact that when a person is highly emotional, his state of mind is inappropriate. Any decisions made in haste shall only lead to the downfall of the decision maker. For instance, a person has just received a call that he has won a lottery. In this very moment, there is heavy gush of dopamine release as the perosn starts to imagine his life getting better with the amount he has just won. With this excitement, he declares that he is throwing a huge party to all his near and dears in a location which he normally could not afford. Only to his worse, later he realises that it is a fake call and he actually won nothing. Now, he is under the obligation to justify his previous invite and figure a way out to cancel the party. It is hence very clear that the person above is a poor decision maker and has to stop thinking indiscriminately.
Second, Considering a situation where anger or adverse emotions plays a role in decision making, then it shall infact be a harder situation to deal with the outcomes of such hasty decisions. For instance, a person has just lost his job. In this moment, he is filled with emotional dispair, and is disturbed strongly. Now if he decides to shout of his famlily becasuse of his loss of job, this will only lead to creation of distress among his members rather than helping to solve and win over the crisis. So this proves that any decison in haste is a poor decision.
However, in some circumstances, decisions take under influence of emotions turns out to be a boon. For instance, consider a situation when a person is awarded with a highly acclaimed award and due to this honour conferred on him, he declares a donation of considerable amount to charity. This move shall not have been possible without the interplay of emotions on being on such a big stage. This is not a poor decision making but infact a decsion made as an outcome of emotions.
Hence, it would be wise to conclude that decisions made under the influence of emotions are in fact poor decisions and only lead to regret in the future however, emotions may bolster the decision making in some situations. Therefore I agree with the claim made by the author.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | yixova3193 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-14 | RIYA MODI | 58 | view |
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you ag 50
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Alta Manufacturing During the past year Alta Manufacturing had thirty percent more on the job accidents than nearby Panoply Industries where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours Experts b 78
- Educators should base their assessment of students learning not on students grasp of facts but on the ability to explain the ideas trends and concepts that those facts illustrate Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disag 66
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 66
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... be it excessively happy or nettled. In this situations, we are not in the normal st...
^^^^
Line 1, column 607, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntrol over their emotional intelligence. Firstly, it is a general fact that when ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... decsion made as an outcome of emotions. Hence, it would be wise to conclude that...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 224, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...the decision making in some situations. Therefore I agree with the claim made by the auth...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, as to, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2314.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6372745491 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65264508703 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462925851703 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.9 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.2816672784 60.3974514979 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.19047619 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7619047619 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38095238095 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25683898638 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776485961878 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692204981244 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168680298901 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634753463137 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.