A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.
In a modern civilized society, rules and law enforcement are put in place to keep mankind in check. When these rules are broken, there would be consequences. Since every crime all occur under unique circumstances, it would not make sense to have the same punishment for every crime. In some rare cases, crime is not always intentionally committed because that individual is not mentally stable. In such cases, a special type of circumstances awaits them such as being sent to a mental hospital/asylum. Regardless of the state of each crime, an alleged criminal should not be able to retain their civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor for a finite duration.
A person who commits crime has violated a set of rules that is accepted and followed by most other people in society, and that would mean that they should not enjoy the benefits that comes with following those rules. Allowing a person to still have the rights that everyone else has means that they are still treated as equals. A criminal is not equal to everyone else because he or she has directly or indirectly hurt society. For example, a criminal who decides to rob a bank is not only endangering that particular bank branch, but also the customers and the employees directly. Indirectly, this affects all the family relatives to those people as well as the all the people that have a bank account opened at that particular bank.
Since a criminal has damaged society in a way, it does not seem logical to continue giving him or her rewards for labor. Normally in society, labor is often done for certain benefits such as money, food, or other goods. A person intentionally committing crime has taken something from society without paying for it. This could be seen as criminal's debt, something that the criminal must find a way to pay off before being accepted back into society. Today, the method and duration of payment is usually determined by the judge.
Of course it would not be right to completely strip a criminal of all his rights. For example, in the United States, criminals are protected from cruel and unusual punishments. If not, criminals could be subjugated to unmoral and unethical events. Other than a few exceptions, however, it would never by logical to allow a person who intentionally commits a crime to still exist equally with everyone else in society, much less benefit from the social contract. The government often makes criminals do public service in order for them to pay back society for the damage they have done, because it should not be okay for a criminal to commit crime for a criminal to continue earning things for their labor as they are in debt.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-11 | Mithil | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anish Sapkota | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Gnyana | 62 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2023-03-16 | Yam Kumar Oli | 50 | view |
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor. 50
- The following is a memorandum from the businessmanager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program hasdevoted increased time to national news and less timeto weather and local news. During this time period,most of the com 69
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, well, for example, of course, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2219.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 464.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78232758621 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59951943646 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495689655172 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7186703394 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0952380952 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25992755122 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739008054873 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940939111528 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162131380179 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657710919854 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.