Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems.
Although science and technology have managed to solve a substantial amount of problems in the past as well as the present, the claim that science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society's problems seems very farfetched. Therefore I disagree with the claim of the author.
The main point of debate that goes against the claim is the topic of God and philosophy. Yes, technology and its machines can solve our physical problems and even perhaps think objectively on our behalf but can it delve into the world of philosophy? In the words of the great scientist Albert Einstein who believed that there are laws of physics itself that are unexplainable by science alone and that indicate the presence of some greater force that has shaped the world as it is today. If the earth was tilted even one degree more on either side, life on earth wouldn't have existed as we know it as it would have been too cold. Building upon this argument, often when we discover something that is revolutionary, we also create other problems. It takes years to solve even one of those problems and sometimes they are not even solvable.
Secondly, the question of morality comes into the picture. Yes, a computer can tell you right from wrong based on the facts but it can't account for human morality and compassion. For example, a robber who is robbing a bank for material gains and a poor farmer robbing a store for some food, both will be held equally guilty and given punishment as per the law. But human compassion will sentence the robber to a greater punishment than the farmer.
Lastly, machines and science cannot work independently on their own. They need people to help them operate and this itself can create problems. Further problems of various religions and belief systems are not quantifiable. Thus in essence science, cant solve those problems. Science and technology are very objective domains that can solve quantifiable problems that we face. But they can either think as humans do nor show the same compassion, practicality, etc. The human brain is a complex organ that probably cant ever be replicated by a machine.
In conclusion, it is very unlikely that science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society's problems. The inherent complexities of societies are not one that lends themselves to being solved by one field or another. There will always be problems within societies, even if only those which result from human nature itself.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 33 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | qwertyy | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-28 | David Okenwa | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | najaf | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | hello_kratnesh101 | 33 | view |
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg the home of SuperCorp s original headquarters Moreover Middl 73
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until the enter college 66
- The following is an excerpt from a speech given to the School Board about a change to the curriculum Because the future will be dominated by technology we must make four years of computer programming mandatory for all high school students If our students 38
- Technology while apparently aimed to simplify our lives only makes our lives more complicated 79
- Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of sidewalk rage similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The result is an increase in assaults property damage and disruptions of 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ocietys problems seems very farfetched. Therefore I disagree with the claim of the author...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...gree more on either side, life on earth wouldnt have existed as we know it as it would ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ht from wrong based on the facts but it cant account for human morality and compassi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...ht from wrong based on the facts but it cant account for human morality and compassi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...nd belief systems are not quantifiable. Thus in essence science, cant solve those pr...
^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... quantifiable. Thus in essence science, cant solve those problems. Science and techn...
^^^^
Line 7, column 515, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... brain is a complex organ that probably cant ever be replicated by a machine. In...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, even so, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 424.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8608490566 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58306189408 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52358490566 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.1897499102 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6818181818 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22727272727 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461685509122 0.243740707755 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119543267847 0.0831039109588 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189012173753 0.0758088955206 249% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304607683239 0.150359130593 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.239625785348 0.0667264976115 359% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.