Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
I believe that knowing the past in a company is one of the most essential thing as a leadership from top-level leaders down to a small team leaders.
Those who don’t know the past are scarcely become great leaders, there are few if any. it’s rarely to heard a freshmen becoming a top leader in a big company, assumed that inheritance cases not considered. On the other hand. We have seen most of leadership are experienced people. For example, Tim Cook as a CEO (chief executive officer), is promoted from manager due to his prominent performance. he absolutely understood the past in apple incorporation, the culture of the company and the manufacturing experience. Without the experience and reputation in his company, he is barely to ascend to that level.
Opponents may argue that knowing the past is useless as a leadership to guide the company, what’s more crucial in the top manager level are the knowledge and the leadership. Although it is certainly true that if leading a big company and the chief executive generally does not require knowing what had happened in the past of the company. For example, apple incorporation, one of the biggest mobile manufacturer, hire a selling strategy executive from Burberry and she is obviously not knowing about the past things in apple, but she still gets the position and qualified for it.
Still, even though she may not understand the past of apple, she is conspicuous to know about the past of Burberry and that experience is going to helping her to address the new position challenges. Furthermore, not only the necessity to know the past as top executives, but also down to team leaders. As a team leadership, he or she executes the project and involve the business details. As project goes, the team leader may address the problems which could already happened in the past, if he or she has the experience then the problem could be solved effectively and efficiently. Besides, knowing about the past, preventing the same fault from happening again, it is risky for business running to make mistakes twice and lose the customer trust. On the contrary, if a team leader who doesn’t know about the past could easily make the same mistake again.
In conclusion, knowing about the past is indispensable as a leader no matter what level he or she is in, it helps people to deal with challenges and prevent the same mistake from happening in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'leader'?
Suggestion: leader
... top-level leaders down to a small team leaders. Those who don’t know the past are sca...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...me great leaders, there are few if any. it’s rarely to heard a freshmen becoming a...
^^
Line 2, column 396, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...nager due to his prominent performance. he absolutely understood the past in apple...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, may, so, still, then, as to, for example, in conclusion, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 412.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86165048544 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78436357308 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478155339806 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6498366663 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.277777778 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.21951772744 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173352561229 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586868324154 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046482799222 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995099389959 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035870376885 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.