Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People in the modern era have realized the urgency of environmental issues, including climate change. As numerous measures have been taken but proved to be ineffective, there are claims that becoming reconciled to the situation is of higher priority than prevention. From the vantage point, I utterly disapprove of the acceptance of climate change, which will be analyzed with specific rationales in the essay below.
To commence with, choosing to co-exist with climate change is considerably challenging due to some reasons. In fact, climate change influences a wide range of life’s aspects such as weather, accomodation, and specifically agriculture. The farmers in underdeveloped and developing countries are likely to suffer from the phenomenon since the industry depends heavily on natural conditions. Thus, every effort to prevent the detrimental effects of climate change on agricultural-based activities is admirable.
Additionally, minimizing the negative consequences of climate change is the human’s responsibilities to the ecosystem. Detailedly, it is activities relating to human’s manufacturing that cause climate change to emerge. In other words, climate change is nothing but the consequences of human evolution. Therefore, each person must not only bear in mind that preventing our adverse impacts on climate change is the common thing but also appreciate the significant importance of the environment offering to humanity.
In conclusion, accepting climate change is a harmful attitude that should be eliminated from general mindsets. We should be responsible for what humans have caused to the natural surroundings, while putting effort and knowledge into practice with the aim to a more sustainable world, which undergoes less devastating impacts of climate change.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the environment offering to humanity. In conclusion, accepting climate change ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82954545455 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27514422186 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621212121212 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.611913216 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.384615385 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209658001462 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770247079661 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436647703731 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122133755316 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036403484701 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.