The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The line graph compares the alarming unemployment rate of Australia for two specific areas, rural and urban areas, in 2012. It divided into four periods of time in a year which is regarded as quarters.
Overall, this period showed a fluctuation linear in both two separate residences and the percentage of unemployment rate in rural areas was higher than in urban areas during the period. It also insisted that there was a huge gap at the begin and ended with nearly similar percentage.
In specific, from the first to the second quarter of the year, the proportion of unemployment situation in rural areas was slightly declined while in urban areas was increased from 2% to approximately 4%. Moreover, the percentage of unemployed people in the first and the third period was similar, which was respectively 2%. In contrast, in rural areas there was slightly changes around 5% in the third and fourth quarters of the year. At the end of the year, which was the fourth quarter, both these two areas were accounted for alike percentage, which was nearly 5%.
- The chart shows the hours per week spent watching TV by gender and by age group in 2001 in Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant Write at least 150 words 52
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- There are social medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones What forms do they take Do you agree the problems of mobile phones outweigh the benefits 61
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters traveling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 67
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph compares the alarming une...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...o insisted that there was a huge gap at the begin and ended with nearly similar percentag...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, second, so, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90555555556 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65991622443 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2598978513 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.375 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0886326986392 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448742205609 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0172608481146 0.0843802449381 20% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0676846534776 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151831170374 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.