The charts show average level of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
The participants’ proportion in education of Singapore population is displayed in the below graphs besides mature people that had third-level education or higher over a one decade from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the number of educated men, as shown in the bar chart, had increased throughout the whole period outnumbering that of women, while in the pie chart there was an upward trend of Singapore total population of university graduates who continued to get a master’s degree.
As we can see in the first graph, the percentage of men who received education marked a gradual growth from 2000 reaching its peak in 2010. Educated ladies’ figure, however; plateaued prior to 2004 with a marginal rise between 2004 and 2008, although their proportion had peaked at the end of the period, still didn’t surpass that of men. To be more accurate we can say adult males had been joining school more than women over a ten year timeframe.
In the early 2000s, small minority approximately less than one in ten had finished college then continued to complete their advanced degree .Whereas in ten years period, this percentage boomed to reach roughly over a third of the country population. Additionally, at the start of the period, around a quarter were satisfied to fulfill only elementary school, while by 2010 the figure for these people declined sharply to an insignificant number.
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009 67
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 56
- The chart shows the British Emigration to selected countries between 2004 to 2007
- The charts show average level of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 73
- The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r over a one decade from 2000 to 2010. Overall, it is clear that the number of ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ho continued to get a master’s degree. As we can see in the first graph, the pe...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... than women over a ten year timeframe. In the early 2000s, small minority appro...
^^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tinued to complete their advanced degree .Whereas in ten years period, this percen...
^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Whereas
...nued to complete their advanced degree .Whereas in ten years period, this percentage bo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, still, then, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06896551724 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78846997542 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646551724138 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8664895449 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.0 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1428571429 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233705837254 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107737833364 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121064588725 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158157567101 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132239500236 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.