The charts show average levels of participation and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore

Essay topics:

The charts show average levels of participation and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.

The line graph illustrate how many mases were in educational institution and graduated schools among 2000to2010 in Singapora.

Over all;it’s clear that Adult males are highter than adult female in the past two decades;with the majority of imports sourced from several schools and Academy schools.

in the future; however;the line graph show case that the out numbering will decline . Between the years 2000and 2010.Adults males in 2010 decrease.from about 13%at the beginning of the period is over in 2010.tailing off about 10%category.

Also; Adult males in 2008.Regarding the geographical splite of imports in 2000and 2010;High school qualifications;master qualifications and university qualifications were the dominant education controlling the other .Under graduated qualifications and university qualifications had the largest share of porpotion on the other hand thay are the same figure 32.93%and 32.13%;followed by master qualifications 30.31%in 2010 in contrast;other qualifications;such as primary school qualifications and master qualifications have 27.77%and 26.3% of trainees in 2000.more over the graph display that the less out numbering between 2000and 2004 adult present 8%in 2000and 2002 . Additionally;the geographical splite illustrate that in 2010 students were the lesser category were secondary or Under graduated students 15.2%and primary qualifications 2.1%.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-06 tata 73 view
2024-06-06 tata 78 view
2024-06-06 tata 67 view
2023-08-08 tata 78 view
2023-08-05 tata 78 view
Essays by user tata :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...several schools and Academy schools. in the future; however;the line graph show...
^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...case that the out numbering will decline . Between the years 2000and 2010.Adults m...
^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Adults
...ecline . Between the years 2000and 2010.Adults males in 2010 decrease.from about 13%at...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... 2010.tailing off about 10%category. Also; Adult males in 2008.Regarding the geog...
^^^^
Line 7, column 27, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Regarding
...%category. Also; Adult males in 2008.Regarding the geographical splite of imports in 2...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...dominant education controlling the other .Under graduated qualifications and unive...
^^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Under
...minant education controlling the other .Under graduated qualifications and university...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 337, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (thay) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...are of porpotion on the other hand thay are the same figure 32.93%and 32.13%;follow...
^^^
Line 7, column 668, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...and 2004 adult present 8%in 2000and 2002 . Additionally;the geographical splite il...
^^
Line 7, column 671, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
... 2004 adult present 8%in 2000and 2002 . Additionally;the geographical splite illustrate that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, second, so, in contrast, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1201.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.25520833333 4.92477711251 127% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.69994312475 2.65546596893 139% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588541666667 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 198.896748758 43.030603864 462% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 200.166666667 112.824112599 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 5.23603664747 258% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135739081394 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679610954495 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390224110992 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849646449758 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038922645092 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.1 13.2329268293 182% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.08 61.2550243902 36% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.3012195122 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.62 11.4140731707 172% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.