The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.
The given line graph illustrated the proportion of travelers visiting four distinctive destinations in Edinburgh of Scotland in three decades from 1980 to 2010.
In general, the number of people visiting the castle and zoo slightly increased, while the portion of tourists who traveled for festivals and aquariums dropped.
On the one hand, in the first period from 1980 to 1995, castle visitors sharply rose and hit the peak at 45%, nearly double compared with the starting point. However, the number of people experiencing the castle gradually fell to 30%, but it still was the most attractive place in the end. On the contrary, the number of people going to the zoo fluctuated around 12% from 1980 to 2000, followed by a shift that changed the zoo to the third popular destination in 2010.
On the other hand, in the first decade, the percentage of people stopping the aquarium altered, but it remained around 20%. Next, aquarium travelers dramatically decreased from 1990 to 2010 and turned into the lowest point with under 10%. Otherwise, people going to the festivals declined minimally over the whole period, and it dropped to the second favorite place in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | beomnie_gyuu | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | Doan Minh | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Nguyen051207 | 56 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh 89
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 78
- Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 33
- Childhood obesity is becoming a serious problem in many countries Explain the main causes and effects of this problem and suggest some possible solutions 61
- Some students prefer to take a gap year between high school and university to work or to travel Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, still, third, while, in general, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02051282051 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57594189765 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579487179487 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.6866502847 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 122.375 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 5.23603664747 239% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130867750434 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563296557847 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838879070139 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102040510275 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968089093872 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.