The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s

Essay topics:

• The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s

The pie chart illustrates the primary causes of agricultural land becoming less productive. The table indicates how three different nations ( North America, Europe, and Oceania ) were affected by these causes over the time 1990s.
Overall, over-grazing occupied the highest proportion in the pie chart. By contrast, the proportion of the other was just a fifth compared to that figure. Back to the table, Europe was the region whose percentage of total land degraded was the highest in three regions.
A closer look at the pie chart highlights the fact that the percentage of over-grazing was 35%, which was higher than over-cultivation’s about 7%. And this figure is the same as the percentage of the other. Therefore, the other had the lowest percentage in the pie chart. While, deforestation had a percentage of about 30%, which was lower than the highest just 5%.
As clearly seen in the table, deforestation and over-cultivation in Europe have the largest percentage in three nations over 9,8% and 7,7% respectively. This figure made Europe’s total land degraded become the highest 23%. However, the percentage of over-grazing in this region just only was the second highest after Oceania’s with 11,3%.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-11 Ahmad_off 56 view
2024-06-11 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-06-11 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-06-11 Ahmad_off 73 view
2023-11-09 Ahmad_off 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le indicates how three different nations North America, Europe, and Oceania were...
^^
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions North America, Europe, and Oceania were affected by these causes over the t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, therefore, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26288659794 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05066248692 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520618556701 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3983147106 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0833333333 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172054364842 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076339928914 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866979494899 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138103259625 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127706880413 0.0819641961636 156% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.