The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.
There are four pie charts informed the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009. The data was implemented in percentages.
Shows that Conventional Thermal positioned as plentiful for All Types in first country mentioned above. It different within France which dominated by Hydroelectric in category of Renewables. while the percentages which has not contributing a value was Geothermal in both state.
Deutsch electricity mostly was produced by Conventional Thermal which had 59.6 of percentages in All Types and Biomass in the Renewables source which had just under a digit of two fifths. The thirth was Wind had number of 36.9%. For All Types source, there was two sectors mention yet which they are Nuclear has 23.0 and renewables has 17.4. while in Renewables sector had Hydroelectric has 17.7, more than a very small number and the last was Geothermal was contributed nothing.
In comparison with France, for All Types source dominated by Nuclear has just over three quarter while Renewables and Conventional Thermal only took more than a fifth for All Types category, that means it opposite against Germany. Meanwhile Hydroelectric was taken a very large majority in Frances' Renewables category which has obtained four-fifths possession. The remaining amount left were Wind had 10.5, Biomass got 8.1, Solar contributed a very small number and the Geothermal was similar as Deutsch Geothermal contribution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-11 | susanti | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-25 | wokoma elisha | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | thy thanh | 11 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | rahulchd | 90 | view |
| 2021-04-18 | dhillonsukh | 73 | view |
- The three pie charts describe a transition per decade about changes in annual spending by particular UK school The data was measured in percentages 11
- The graph gives information about changes in the birth and death in new Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 78
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009 73
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ydroelectric in category of Renewables. while the percentages which has not contribut...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ydroelectric in category of Renewables. while the percentages which has not contribut...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...clear has 23.0 and renewables has 17.4. while in Renewables sector had Hydroelectric ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...othermal was contributed nothing. In comparison with France, for All Types source domin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...that means it opposite against Germany. Meanwhile Hydroelectric was taken a very large ma...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40434782609 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94623851055 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526086956522 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.2766583618 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.27272727273 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263823642713 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119614648573 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.220625130009 0.0843802449381 261% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236615433946 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.243014128079 0.0819641961636 296% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.