The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given pie charts compare the proportion of electricity produced in two European countries, Germany and France, sorted by the different sources used (conventional thermal, nuclear and natural) in 2009.

Overall, as can be seen, Germany had generated noticeably most of its energy from conventional thermal sources whilst France heavily relied on nuclear as their main source of power production.

In 2009, it is visible that Germany produced relatively more energy (560 billion kWh) as opposed to France (510 billion kWh). Conventional thermal sources were most commonly used in Germany, producing almost 60% in total, whereas France used nuclear sources mostly and they had become its primary source of power, reaching 76%. On top of that, Germany did not use nuclear sources as much as France did and the percentage was observed to be only 23% while conventional thermal 10.3% in France.

As for natural sources, surprisingly, France deeply depended on hydroelectric sources (80.5%) while Germany preferred to evenly distribute their production among two sources which were biomass (39.3%) and wind (36.9%). Solar, however, contributed the least to both countries and was recorded with 6.1% for Germany and insignificantly, 0.9% for France.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-25 benj212 56 view
2019-12-30 Vrajesh 73 view
2019-12-30 Vrajesh 61 view
2019-11-12 Siva69 73 view
2019-04-22 cecilia 73 view
Essays by user vadimtimb :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, whereas, while, as for, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47395833333 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7693399406 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.3813008353 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.166666667 112.824112599 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193222929664 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102990639296 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489089648601 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130890319689 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347649224742 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.2329268293 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.04 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.