The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in 5 different countries in 2002.
The given table illustrates the rate of national consumer expenditure on three different categories namely Food/Drinks/Tobacco, Clothing/Footwear, and Leisure/Education in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and Turkey in the year 2012.
Overall, as can be seen from the table, it is clear that populations in these five nations had a tendency to spend the most on Food/Drinks/Tobacco, while Leisure/Education was the category being given the least care by these countries’ citizens.
With regard to Food/Drinks/Tobacco, the rate of Turkish residents consuming this item was the highest, at approximately a third, while the figure for Ireland was slightly lower, at about 29%. Meanwhile, Food/Drink/Tobacco accounted for roughly 18,8% of the total spending of the population living in Spain. In addition, 16,36% and 15,77% were the figures for this item in Italy and Sweden respectively.
Looking at Clothing/Footwear and Leisure/Education, the proportion of consumer spending on Clothing/Footwear was the highest in Italy, at 9%, while the figure for Sweden was the lowest, at 5.4%. In terms of Leisure/Education, the percentage of expenditure in this category in Turkey was higher than in other countries, at 4.35%. By contrast, spending on this item in Spain made up the smallest proportion, at 1.98% of the total spending in this country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-23 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-31 | vinh_hoang | view | |
| 2021-09-24 | Nimasha | 62 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | jenmin | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | jenmin | 61 | view |
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy used 67
- The maps below show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25 year period from 1980 to 2005 73
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 73
- The table and pie charts below show the number of research students in Australian universities in 2001 and 2010 67
- The maps below show the village of Stakeford in 1930 and 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, third, while, in addition, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61274509804 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.99657136312 2.65546596893 151% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563725490196 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.377049141 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.125 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131407030163 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595562024577 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387272215538 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827365010641 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299746766065 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.