Because many children are not able to learn foreign languages, schools should not force them to learn foreign languages.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
All children may not have the ability to learn other international languages therefore, the educational board should not make it compulsory. This essay disagrees with the statement strict linguistic studies often provide better results and advanced achievements.
People who oppose forceful language studies may argue due to the stress and fear of failure. Uninterested pupils who insisted to learn a foreign language would affect their overall studies and academic performance in other subjects too. They often think each child has different perspectives about their future as they could find their way to success rather than language studies. For instance, some children have an interest in extracurricular activities like sports and arts. Compelling them to learn unfamiliar languages in school might affect their track performance to the core. Similarly, opposers believe, advanced technology would help them to manage linguistic vulnerability in any situation as a whole even if they are illiterate in another language. for instance, language translators in Google platforms.
On the other hand, since the dawn of industrialisation and technological development, foreign language study led to the highest position. Multilingualism would be an excellent qualification for a person in modern society, especially in an international language. Various governmental projects and business achievers also need a person with bilingual. If the school authority insists the children learn other advanced languages would help them to find a better job, overseas studies, bright future and be able to donate economic growth of the native country. Therefore, the School board should find some ways to attract children to learn languages like tricks and tips, technical supports, and sustainable faculties.
To sum up, it is true that pupils have some trouble learning foreign languages. Even though, helping them to tackle the problem and providing support to learn would be more beneficial rather than losing language studies.
- The maps below show the university campus at present and in the future after some planned changes Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some people believe bicycle have a lot of advantages while others believe bicycle have more disadvantages Discuss both views and give your opinion 63
- Nowadays young people admire sports stars though they often do not set a good example Do you think this is a positive or negative development 55
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in canada from 1992 to 2007
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 762, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...hey are illiterate in another language. for instance, language translators in Googl...
^^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help them find' instead.
Suggestion: help them find
...en learn other advanced languages would help them to find a better job, overseas studies, bright ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, similarly, so, therefore, for instance, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71854304636 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01422915303 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582781456954 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2784601848 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.9375 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3210194095 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103915144417 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730095177082 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200978049656 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318281640709 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.