The best way to resolve the international environment problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that raising fuel prices would be a useful measure to deal with environmental issues. Personally, I disagree that it would represent the best way to tackle global environmental problems.
On the one hand, governments should raise the taxes on the cost of fuel. By this way, national authority would almost certainly ensure people used their cars less. Fewer car journeys would lead to be reduction in exhaust emissions. This would bring more international consequences, such as slowing the process of global warming because of greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere was reduces. Moreover, the natural energy sources will not last forever, and by increasing petrol prices there would be less dependence on fossil fuels. Therefore, I believe that international bodies should put pressure on countries to raise fuel prices.
However, I believe that there are more measures to tackle international environment issues. Firstly, the national authorities could restrict using of private vehicles and encourage residents travel to work by public transports. For example, government provides more free metro for citizens to go to work, as a result, fewer and fewer people are driving their cars, and the emissions will reduce. Secondly, one of effective methods is the government should invest in research into alternative energy sources like solar, wind or nuclear energy. For instance, Singapore state government has asked factories in the city use solar energy to heat water instead of using oil. This helped to Singapore reduce the amount of toxic emissions to the environment and become one of cities has cleanest air in the world.
In conclusion, although raising the cost of fuel is a good solution, national authorities could use other effective measures to deal with global environmental problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 776, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the cleanest'.
Suggestion: has the cleanest
...he environment and become one of cities has cleanest air in the world. In conclusion, alt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44912280702 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82069038435 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59298245614 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6428484596 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.533333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118721622255 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446389248708 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435854584138 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776894917379 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295543020674 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.