International tourism has brought about enormous benefits to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment. Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?
International tourism has become very popular these days. This phenomenon gives countless advantages to countries across the globe. As a reverse, it also damages locals and their surrondings. In this essay, I will explain why the potential benefits of international tourism overshadow the drawback.
On the one hand, international tourism destination can offer various benefits on host destinations. To begin with, tourism boosts the revenue of the economy. Many governments that rely on tourism for a big percentage of their revenue invest a lot in the infrastructure of the country. This leads to new roads and highways, developed parks, improved public spaces, new airports, and possibly better schools and hospitals. Thus, local people experience an opportunity for economic growth. Moreover, tourism creates a cultural exchange between tourists and local citizens. Exhibitions, conferences, and events usually attract foreigners. Organaizing authorities usually gain profits from registration fees and gift sales. Furthermore, foreign tourists bring diversity and cultural enrichment to the hosting country.
Although there is a sudden growth in the infrastructure of the country, which can be amaizing, there can be major downfall. International tourism can lead to immense environmental damage, especially in destinations that are extremely popular and tourist-heavy. This does not usually happen because the tourists themselves directly cause the damage, but rather it happens because of the higher number of planes flying and cars driving. This peak in activity leads to higher cabon monoxide production within a country, thus negatively affecting the environment.
In conclusion, while environmental damage can occur in several places of interest, the enthralling economic support and the benefit from the cultural exchange offered by international tourism can undermine the negative effect. Thereby, on balance, I firmly convince that the advantages of international toursim outweight its disadvantage.
- A lot of people have become dependent on technology as it plays a big role in our daily lives Do you agree that living in computer age has more advantages than disadvantages 89
- Many Offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishments Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle these problems 78
- In some countries more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this question 67
- Some people think that due to improvements in technology traditional skills of writing letters will disappear do you agree or disagree 61
- Many people say that the only way to guarantee getting a good job is to complete a course of university education Others claim that it is better to start work after school and gain experience in the world of work How far do you agree or disagree with the 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nal toursim outweight its disadvantage.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, while, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95189003436 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1816035724 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628865979381 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6185815145 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1578947368 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3157894737 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207726885564 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649311327148 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621866431907 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139697599185 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597035861788 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.64 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nal toursim outweight its disadvantage.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, while, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95189003436 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1816035724 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628865979381 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6185815145 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1578947368 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3157894737 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207726885564 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649311327148 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621866431907 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139697599185 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597035861788 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.64 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.