Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages. If these are not taught, many are at risk of dying out.
In your opinion, is it important for everyone to learn English? Should we try to ensure the survival of local languages and, if so, how?
In times of globalization, English has become the lingua franca and held sway over any other languages, which makes dialects wane in importance. From my standpoint, everyone should strive to excel in English, as well as spearheading efforts to preserve local languages.
On the one hand, the need for everyone to learn English is well-grounded. First of all, being skilled in English opens up employment opportunities in multinational corporations. Conventionally, when applying to these international companies, candidates have to undergo some tests and interviews, which are all in English. Therefore, if one is hopeless in this language, he or she stands low chances of being employed. Meanwhile, it goes without saying that people having good command of English are extolled as first-rate candidates, augmenting their chances of being admitted. As a result, all benefits from these enterprises such as high salaries, increments, incentive schemes or working environment accrue to people good at English. Secondly, learning English contributes greatly to international connections. English allows countries to gain mutual understanding, building solid rapports among nations when it comes to negotiations, trade discussions or messages transmission, to name but a few.
On the other hand, it stands to reason that local languages should be conserved because of their pivotal roles in life. Obviously, local languages are integral to traditional and cultural values of each region. Hence, if local languages were not to be protected, some traditions and cultures might fall into oblivion, not to mention that they may become extinct. As a consequence, each country’s originality may be in deep trouble, as they can assimilate into European culture.
Therefore, on the premise that local languages need to be prevented from falling into disuse, people should take actions immediately. First and foremost, schools should promote local languages by including them in syllabus so as to raise students’ awareness. Besides, an ultimate answer to conserving local languages is to take full advantage of social media to disseminate the unexceptional importance of local languages in our lives.
In conclusion, either English or local languages should not be belittled, as both of them are advantageous in certain aspects. Thus, we should put effort into learning English and simultaneously, ensuring the survival of local languages by requiring them in studying curriculum and passing on their roles in cyberspace.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-28 | An Hai Nguyen | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-09 | Angina | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-01 | brick | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-14 | manu_kaur113 | 56 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | huuanhtruong | 84 | view |
- Some countries have an ever increasing proportion of the population who are aged 15 or younger What do you think are the current and future effects of this trend for those countries 73
- The increasingly wide use of computers in education has decreased the importance of teachers roles in the classroom To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English Should we try to ensure the survival of local lang 89
- Some people say that what individuals protect the environment cannot make a difference Other people say that every individual should take responsibility for it Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The diagram below shows two different processes for manufacturing black tea Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...languages by including them in syllabus so as to raise students’ awareness. Besides, an ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2147.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20484722044 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594736842105 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7318741724 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26315789474 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303891922512 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092602255314 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653670498353 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161324003848 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598246779627 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.