As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the user should cover the costs. Discuss 2 views and give your opinion.
Improving the road system is a matter of the most concern due to the proliferation of private cars recently. While some people argue that those who use cars should shoulder the responsibility for paying for the construction of roads, I believe that such expenditures should be the liability of the government.
The principal reason why car commuters should cover these costs stems from their overuse of road. Compared to other means of transportation like a bicycle and a motorcycle, a car obviously not only occupies much more road space, but also wears the road more due to its large weight and size. In 2019, Seasia website released data on car ownership ratio for every 1,000 people of Southeast Asian countries, accordingly Brunei topped the list with 721 vehicles. As a result, the need for expansion and enhancement of roads is mainly to facilitate a more comfortable journey for car users. Therefore, it is reasonable to assign the disbursements to car owners to pay for the maintenance and extension of the infrastructure. In addition, when citizens incurring additional costs for road system discourage their desire for driving, which will help to reduce traffic congestion and also pollution.
However, I think that the investment for road infrastructure project should be incurred by the government for the following reason. Firstly, the main role of authorities is to improve the citizens' standard of living, and an efficient transportation system is just one of the residents' basic need. In fact, the efficiency in road transport is the backbone of a country's economy, and therefore it is not too difficult to understand why governments always give this top priority. Secondly, as in many countries, car buyers are charged an exorbitant amount of tax when they want to own and drive a car on roads, so it is unfair for them to shoulder additional charges for road upgrades. For example, inhabitants in VietNam have to spend almost twice as much to own a car than in other nations because of taxes and fee account for 40-50% of car prices.
In conclusion, states can use the proceeds from taxes and BOT stations for road infrastructure investment instead of putting more burden on people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-10 | Manideep Macherla | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | ozair | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | ozair | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-19 | xiao_alatus | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
- Some people think international car free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution however others think there are other ways Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss 2 views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations Others think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed Discuss these views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people are born to be leaders while others believe leadership can be learnt Discuss both views and give opinion 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05753424658 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97513811453 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580821917808 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.3252760141 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.857142857 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0714285714 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328876444262 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113642643742 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623443788713 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191174911061 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725269055841 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05753424658 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97513811453 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580821917808 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.3252760141 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.857142857 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0714285714 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328876444262 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113642643742 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623443788713 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191174911061 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725269055841 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.